Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9106272" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Demonstrating some of those examples might be helpful, but, logically, people DID know that if something scored less than 50% then it wouldn't get iterated on more. Because WoTC told us that directly. </p><p></p><p>Does voting "disapprove" mean something will get less than 50%? We don't know that. You can make assumptions, you can guess, you can try and divine the tea leaves, but until you have WoTCs internal data, you don't know that. Maybe those things hit less than 50% because many people voted "Greatly Disapprove" and WANTED it killed. Templates for Wildshape was like that. I wanted it iterated on, but many people despised it. I can't prove that they didn't simply outnumber me. </p><p></p><p>You are trying to connect singular votes to the final result, but that simply doesn't work. Some people voted Greatly Disapprove and ranted in their comments about how terrible the Cleric Divine Order was... and it went through and was iterated on. Some people voted Greatly Disapprove on Weapon Mastery's, and we know those are guaranteed to make it into the 2024 PHB. You can't draw these lines the way you want to to "prove" the survey isn't working. </p><p></p><p>And, finally, you are assuming that WoTC was asking "Would you like to see a revised version of X?" AND that people were answering expecting "Would you like to see a revised version of X?" to be the question. Which are also two different things, and not necessarily true. I certainly approached each question from the viewpoint of "what do I think of this being in the final book" which is a 3rd very different question</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9106272, member: 6801228"] Demonstrating some of those examples might be helpful, but, logically, people DID know that if something scored less than 50% then it wouldn't get iterated on more. Because WoTC told us that directly. Does voting "disapprove" mean something will get less than 50%? We don't know that. You can make assumptions, you can guess, you can try and divine the tea leaves, but until you have WoTCs internal data, you don't know that. Maybe those things hit less than 50% because many people voted "Greatly Disapprove" and WANTED it killed. Templates for Wildshape was like that. I wanted it iterated on, but many people despised it. I can't prove that they didn't simply outnumber me. You are trying to connect singular votes to the final result, but that simply doesn't work. Some people voted Greatly Disapprove and ranted in their comments about how terrible the Cleric Divine Order was... and it went through and was iterated on. Some people voted Greatly Disapprove on Weapon Mastery's, and we know those are guaranteed to make it into the 2024 PHB. You can't draw these lines the way you want to to "prove" the survey isn't working. And, finally, you are assuming that WoTC was asking "Would you like to see a revised version of X?" AND that people were answering expecting "Would you like to see a revised version of X?" to be the question. Which are also two different things, and not necessarily true. I certainly approached each question from the viewpoint of "what do I think of this being in the final book" which is a 3rd very different question [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
Top