Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9108683" data-attributes="member: 6801228">So, you just make accusations towards people with no rhyme or reason? &quot;Well, I don't know why I think you didn't consider this, but if you were to tell me what I want to know, I could tell you&quot; is just... really telling on yourself. That is a nonsense answer. Yes, there is a likely &quot;binary&quot; between 80% and 79%. But that doesn't mean that 70 to 79% is a threshold that therefore requires improvement. You are just ignoring anything that doesn't agree with your nearly baseless criticism. Because game design isn't binary. It is complex. There is more than just &quot;perfect&quot; and &quot;Trash&quot; as things that something you have designed can be. There are a spectrum of options. Except that they had to have lied to us, because you want to know what these thresholds mean, because they can't mean what JC literally says they mean. Literally, you have argued against every single thing WoTC says they are doing, saying it is impossible they could actually be doing that, because it doesn't fit within your conception of how these surveys MUST be being handled. I don't know or care. It was a single release from a company with over 200 brands. Again, 1 in 200 failure rate is still over 99% success rate. Is your standard &quot;if you failed once, then you likely fail all the time&quot;? Or do we look at a 99% success rate and say.... that they are probably succeeding most of the time? Or is that too much pandering for your taste? So you fundamentally do not understand the situation. They didn't WANT to fix the issue. That wasn't their goal. Again, the Murderer makes a bad decision by framing an innocent man, because they should have made sure no one goes to jail and that guy has a happy life. Um... No, that isn't the murderers goal in any way, shape or form.Again, what do you think you are proving here? You keep hounding this point that companies aren't perfect, like if I admit that for the 5th time that somehow magically your evidence triples in strength and becomes irrefutable. This doesn't prove what you want it to prove.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9108683, member: 6801228"] So, you just make accusations towards people with no rhyme or reason? "Well, I don't know why I think you didn't consider this, but if you were to tell me what I want to know, I could tell you" is just... really telling on yourself. That is a nonsense answer. Yes, there is a likely "binary" between 80% and 79%. But that doesn't mean that 70 to 79% is a threshold that therefore requires improvement. You are just ignoring anything that doesn't agree with your nearly baseless criticism. Because game design isn't binary. It is complex. There is more than just "perfect" and "Trash" as things that something you have designed can be. There are a spectrum of options. Except that they had to have lied to us, because you want to know what these thresholds mean, because they can't mean what JC literally says they mean. Literally, you have argued against every single thing WoTC says they are doing, saying it is impossible they could actually be doing that, because it doesn't fit within your conception of how these surveys MUST be being handled. I don't know or care. It was a single release from a company with over 200 brands. Again, 1 in 200 failure rate is still over 99% success rate. Is your standard "if you failed once, then you likely fail all the time"? Or do we look at a 99% success rate and say.... that they are probably succeeding most of the time? Or is that too much pandering for your taste? So you fundamentally do not understand the situation. They didn't WANT to fix the issue. That wasn't their goal. Again, the Murderer makes a bad decision by framing an innocent man, because they should have made sure no one goes to jail and that guy has a happy life. Um... No, that isn't the murderers goal in any way, shape or form. Again, what do you think you are proving here? You keep hounding this point that companies aren't perfect, like if I admit that for the 5th time that somehow magically your evidence triples in strength and becomes irrefutable. This doesn't prove what you want it to prove. [/QUOTE]

Verification