Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9114053" data-attributes="member: 6801228">You said the exact thing I said, which then caused you and Mamba to constantly harrass me about how I think all companies are perfect and without error. If when I said it, that's what it meant, why doesn't it mean that when you say it?See, this is exactly the kind of crap I'm talking about. I didn't say they have to be &quot;absolutely identical&quot; that is a vicious strawman meant to make it easy to knock over what I said. I said they have obvious differences, and make bad comparisons. You could try and compare a train and a car, because both are land vehicles with wheels, but if you want to say that your driver's license allows you to crew a train you would be being ridiculous. Not everything said is black and white, 100% or 0%Hmmm, interesting. Why then do you say it was a mistake if it was selling well and only a loud minority hated it?By asking a question you answered with &quot;because Luck&quot; I'M the one who brought luck into the discussion? Holy projection batman.Maybe because I never claimed Luck doesn't play a role? So that information is like telling me that humans eat food. I never disagreed with it, so why would it be worth responding to. Meanwhile, when I asked the question, your answer was SOLELY referencing luck. If I asked you &quot;how did John Brown become such a good football player&quot; and you said &quot;Because he was scouted by the Rams&quot;... well, you didn't state &quot;the only reason is because he was scouted by the Rams&quot;... but you certainly gave that as the only reason with nothing else being considered.FGHEWASVDBFDGNJYRHTERDSBFGNDFJRTHERSGDBFDNHTERGEASRHE</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9114053, member: 6801228"] You said the exact thing I said, which then caused you and Mamba to constantly harrass me about how I think all companies are perfect and without error. If when I said it, that's what it meant, why doesn't it mean that when you say it? See, this is exactly the kind of crap I'm talking about. I didn't say they have to be "absolutely identical" that is a vicious strawman meant to make it easy to knock over what I said. I said they have obvious differences, and make bad comparisons. You could try and compare a train and a car, because both are land vehicles with wheels, but if you want to say that your driver's license allows you to crew a train you would be being ridiculous. Not everything said is black and white, 100% or 0% Hmmm, interesting. Why then do you say it was a mistake if it was selling well and only a loud minority hated it? By asking a question you answered with "because Luck"[B][I] I'M [/I][/B]the one who brought luck into the discussion? Holy projection batman. Maybe because I never claimed Luck doesn't play a role? So that information is like telling me that humans eat food. I never disagreed with it, so why would it be worth responding to. Meanwhile, when I asked the question, your answer was SOLELY referencing luck. If I asked you "how did John Brown become such a good football player" and you said "Because he was scouted by the Rams"... well, you didn't state "the only reason is because he was scouted by the Rams"... but you certainly gave that as the only reason with nothing else being considered. FGHEWASVDBFDGNJYRHTERDSBFGNDFJRTHERSGDBFDNHTERGEASRHE [/QUOTE]

Verification