Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 9117861" data-attributes="member: 7034611">Good summary for your entire post. You have shown repeatedly that you do not understand the first thing about the claim I am making or the implications of it on the playtest results. This post is a great example of that. You are arguing ten things that have nothing to do with my claim instead of the one thing I asked you for that does…If I were correct in my analysis, what would the impact on the playtest be? If you understood that, you should see why most of what you posted to show me wrong is just nonsensical…I tried correcting all your misguided interpretations and arguments that came from that, but that is just a never ending game of whack-a-mole I lost any interest in. That is why I said in my last post that I want exactly two things from you and predicted you would address neither, and sure enough, that is exactly what you did.I now want one of those two things only, as I said the other was irrelevant all along anyway. I just wanted that so you for once back up anything you say. The one that is left isNo backing up needed here, just your own analysis and understanding. Not expecting anything this time either, you have been going for weeks without ever even attempting that. I am not continuing the whack-a-mole game. Either you come with something worth responding to, or I simply will ignore it instead of trying to point out why it isn't.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mamba, post: 9117861, member: 7034611"] Good summary for your entire post. You have shown repeatedly that you do not understand the first thing about the claim I am making or the implications of it on the playtest results. This post is a great example of that. You are arguing ten things that have nothing to do with my claim instead of the one thing I asked you for that does… If I were correct in my analysis, what would the impact on the playtest be? If you understood that, you should see why most of what you posted to show me wrong is just nonsensical… I tried correcting all your misguided interpretations and arguments that came from that, but that is just a never ending game of whack-a-mole I lost any interest in. That is why I said in my last post that I want exactly two things from you and predicted you would address neither, and sure enough, that is exactly what you did. I now want one of those two things only, as I said the other was irrelevant all along anyway. I just wanted that so you for once back up anything you say. The one that is left is No backing up needed here, just your own analysis and understanding. Not expecting anything this time either, you have been going for weeks without ever even attempting that. I am not continuing the whack-a-mole game. Either you come with something worth responding to, or I simply will ignore it instead of trying to point out why it isn't. [/QUOTE]

Verification