Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9127903" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>Or 70% or 80% of 65% of 82% or...</p><p></p><p>Since it's impossible for them to get an accurate percentage, how the hell are they competently coming up with percentages for keeping something vs. re-writing it vs. ditching it?</p><p></p><p>It doesn't matter. They still can't get an accurate percentage for them to use to keep, modify or ditch the ability being voted on.</p><p></p><p>You might as well guess at the percentage. They are. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> </p><p></p><p>A lot of people apparently liked chopped up oxen. It's also a False Equivalence. </p><p></p><p>The reason they guessed that close was that they give actual numbers. 801 pounds. 745 pounds. 1103 pounds. You can average those numbers to come up with an answer. Similarly, if they actually asked us to rate each ability from 1-100 they could accurately gauge percentages. If those people guessing the weight of that ox had only had Very heavy, heavy, not that heavy and very light to choose from, it would have been impossible to come up with numbers to apply to the true weight of the ox.</p><p></p><p>So a contest where they gave measurable numbers is not at all equivalent to a survey where you give no numbers at all.</p><p></p><p>Yes you did. Satisfied to some degree is 51% or higher. You literally had very dissatisfied = satisfied as you started the very dissatisfied rating at 60% and then went down from there. </p><p></p><p>Um, yes. That's what dissatisfied means. It means you don't like it as presented and don't want it that way at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9127903, member: 23751"] Or 70% or 80% of 65% of 82% or... Since it's impossible for them to get an accurate percentage, how the hell are they competently coming up with percentages for keeping something vs. re-writing it vs. ditching it? It doesn't matter. They still can't get an accurate percentage for them to use to keep, modify or ditch the ability being voted on. You might as well guess at the percentage. They are. 🤷♂️ A lot of people apparently liked chopped up oxen. It's also a False Equivalence. The reason they guessed that close was that they give actual numbers. 801 pounds. 745 pounds. 1103 pounds. You can average those numbers to come up with an answer. Similarly, if they actually asked us to rate each ability from 1-100 they could accurately gauge percentages. If those people guessing the weight of that ox had only had Very heavy, heavy, not that heavy and very light to choose from, it would have been impossible to come up with numbers to apply to the true weight of the ox. So a contest where they gave measurable numbers is not at all equivalent to a survey where you give no numbers at all. Yes you did. Satisfied to some degree is 51% or higher. You literally had very dissatisfied = satisfied as you started the very dissatisfied rating at 60% and then went down from there. Um, yes. That's what dissatisfied means. It means you don't like it as presented and don't want it that way at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
Top