Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 9130566" data-attributes="member: 7034611">I grant you this, so we can move on from it, it is not relevantI don't think I disagreed with this point, in that they are using that survey method. That does not address any of the issues with their survey that I brought up however. You can use a widely used methodology wrong too....This does not address any of the issues I raised, it just explains what I already know, i.e. what WotC is doingNo, it is not based on the company asking, it is based on the questions being asked, the information you as a participant have available while answering, and the answers the survey is intended to give the people coming up with the survey. In theory Google can screw this up just as much as WotC.I gave specific issues I have, you cannot just handwave them away by saying 'others manage to have different surveys with a similar approach where they do not run into these problems'. If I tell you my car broke down because of X, you cannot just say 'no it didn't break down, the proof for that is that many cars never break down'... Either finally address them directly, or move on.EDIT: [USER=23751]@Maxperson[/USER] is going into more detail in their post right below, I am tired of repeating my points over and over again, just for you to always ignore them anyway. They should be clear by now, or at a minimum you can find them if you actually want to address them for a change</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mamba, post: 9130566, member: 7034611"] I grant you this, so we can move on from it, it is not relevant I don't think I disagreed with this point, in that they are using that survey method. That does not address any of the issues with their survey that I brought up however. You can use a widely used methodology wrong too.... This does not address any of the issues I raised, it just explains what I already know, i.e. what WotC is doing No, it is not based on the company asking, it is based on the questions being asked, the information you as a participant have available while answering, and the answers the survey is intended to give the people coming up with the survey. In theory Google can screw this up just as much as WotC. I gave specific issues I have, you cannot just handwave them away by saying 'others manage to have different surveys with a similar approach where they do not run into these problems'. If I tell you my car broke down because of X, you cannot just say 'no it didn't break down, the proof for that is that many cars never break down'... Either finally address them directly, or move on. EDIT: [USER=23751]@Maxperson[/USER] is going into more detail in their post right below, I am tired of repeating my points over and over again, just for you to always ignore them anyway. They should be clear by now, or at a minimum you can find them if you actually want to address them for a change [/QUOTE]

Verification