Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9131101" data-attributes="member: 23751">[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.forbes.com/sites/serenitygibbons/2019/04/27/why-your-customer-surveys-are-probably-inaccurate/?sh=fb38a3865bfe[/URL]WotC surveys make a number of those mistakes.Because playtests are super stable and don't shift. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />No. I talked about them getting percentages for each category independently and only as a broad X percentage voted this way, which doesn't give a hard satisfaction rating.&nbsp; i.e. you can say that 44% of survey takers said they were satisfied, but you can't say that there was an 80% satisfaction rating, because they can't know how satisfied the customers were with their votes of &quot;satisfied&quot; or &quot;very satisfied.&quot;&nbsp; You might be &quot;very satisfied&quot; at 66% and I might be &quot;very satisfied&quot; at 88%Because we are not wrong and you haven't actually countered what we are saying.&nbsp; You keep misunderstanding things and trying to counter things we aren't saying with links and statements that aren't accurate about what WotC is actually doing.Good God! <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤦‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f926-2642.png" title="Man facepalming&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_facepalming:" data-shortname=":man_facepalming:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> They CAN'T do that.&nbsp; It's not possible, because none of their specific satisfaction percentages are accurate.&nbsp; It's quite literally impossible for them to know how many of the &quot;unsatisfied&quot; and &quot;very unsatisfied&quot; customers want the idea scrapped completely and how many want another iteration of the ability.Just repeating &quot;They use the entirety of it!&quot; doesn't counter diddly.&nbsp; Yes they are.&nbsp; Not directly, but if they are saying that if satisfaction hits X percentage they will give it another go, they are asking it indirectly. If they weren't, they wouldn't be doing it.And yet they announced a percentage of satisfaction that if hit, will result in trying to make a successful incarnation of the ability.&nbsp; You've just admitted they don't have accurate data to determine that.&nbsp; Thanks for finally conceding one of the points that [USER=7034611]@mamba[/USER] and I have been making.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9131101, member: 23751"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.forbes.com/sites/serenitygibbons/2019/04/27/why-your-customer-surveys-are-probably-inaccurate/?sh=fb38a3865bfe[/URL] WotC surveys make a number of those mistakes. Because playtests are super stable and don't shift. ;) No. I talked about them getting percentages for each category independently and only as a broad X percentage voted this way, which doesn't give a hard satisfaction rating. i.e. you can say that 44% of survey takers said they were satisfied, but you can't say that there was an 80% satisfaction rating, because they can't know how satisfied the customers were with their votes of "satisfied" or "very satisfied." You might be "very satisfied" at 66% and I might be "very satisfied" at 88% Because we are not wrong and you haven't actually countered what we are saying. You keep misunderstanding things and trying to counter things we aren't saying with links and statements that aren't accurate about what WotC is actually doing. Good God! 🤦‍♂️ They CAN'T do that. It's not possible, because none of their specific satisfaction percentages are accurate. It's quite literally impossible for them to know how many of the "unsatisfied" and "very unsatisfied" customers want the idea scrapped completely and how many want another iteration of the ability. Just repeating "They use the entirety of it!" doesn't counter diddly. Yes they are. Not directly, but if they are saying that if satisfaction hits X percentage they will give it another go, they are asking it indirectly. If they weren't, they wouldn't be doing it. And yet they announced a percentage of satisfaction that if hit, will result in trying to make a successful incarnation of the ability. You've just admitted they don't have accurate data to determine that. Thanks for finally conceding one of the points that [USER=7034611]@mamba[/USER] and I have been making. [/QUOTE]

Verification