Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9132165" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Do they now? </p><p></p><p>1) <strong><u>Sampling and Reliability</u></strong>: WoTC is making no mistakes here. They are getting a plenty large sample size, and they know exactly who they are getting. Self-selected survey takers ie the most passionate and engaged section of the fan-base, those they need to please the most to ensure long-term success. </p><p></p><p>2) <strong><u>Inherent Bias in Questions</u></strong>: WoTC is making no mistakes here. Their questions are perfectly neutral </p><p></p><p>3) <strong><u>Allow Logistical Hurdles to Disrupt Participation</u></strong>: Okay, granted, they could have a mistake here. Their surveys have gotten longer and longer, and the questions are all essentially the same. There is a fatigue factor at play. Though it is also mitigated by the self-selection of passionate people who will work through the survey anyways. But, I can give this to you, it isn't like this point has been made by either of you before right this moment. </p><p></p><p>4)<strong><u> Conflating Attitude and Behavior</u></strong>: Not a mistake WoTC is making, they aren't asking anything like either of these</p><p></p><p>5) <strong><u>Ignorance of Outliers</u></strong>: HAHAHAHA, yeah, WoTC isn't making this mistake any time soon. They are WELL aware of their outliers. </p><p></p><p>6) <strong><u>Confirmation Bias</u></strong>: Very little evidence of this at all, so can't say it is a mistake WoTC is making. </p><p></p><p>7) <strong><u>Correlation for Causation</u></strong>: Doesn't apply to the questions being asked, so can't be a mistake they are making </p><p></p><p></p><p>Finally, "<em>and only a rigorous and critical look can definitively improve your results.</em>" Something we can say with confidence WoTC has done over the last decade. So, in summary... they may have made ONE of those mistakes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Playtest 7 hasn't changed since I downloaded it. And it won't until... WoTC changes it. Seems like a completely different situation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You don't need a "hard" satisfaction rating, whatever that means. And, yes, you CAN say that there was an 80% satisfaction overall. That math is completely possible to do, using the techniques developed by the field. It is not actually impossible, as has been demonstrated by the people in the field... doing exactly that all the time, across disciplines.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>IT</p><p>IS</p><p>NOT</p><p>IMPOSSIBLE</p><p></p><p>You keep insisting it is. It isn't. They are capable of taking all their results and getting a single percentage. You are wrong about this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Asking a question directly is what they are doing, then using the answer to that question to determine step two. You can't declare their questions are wrong because they are using the answer to determine something, and then declare they are "indirectly" asking a question they are not asking. </p><p></p><p>You keep reading into their survey things that are not there, to justify your declarations that was is there is flawed. That isn't how this works.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, they announce the percentage of "We like this". Then they use that data to determine if they should reiterate something. BUT THEY DO NOT ASK IF WE WANT THEM TO REITERATE IT. That isn't the goal of the survey. That isn't what they are gathering data on. I've conceded this point before, because it is a non-point. The only reason you two think this is a victory for you is you keep intentionally misrepresenting what WoTC is actually doing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9132165, member: 6801228"] Do they now? 1) [B][U]Sampling and Reliability[/U][/B]: WoTC is making no mistakes here. They are getting a plenty large sample size, and they know exactly who they are getting. Self-selected survey takers ie the most passionate and engaged section of the fan-base, those they need to please the most to ensure long-term success. 2) [B][U]Inherent Bias in Questions[/U][/B]: WoTC is making no mistakes here. Their questions are perfectly neutral 3) [B][U]Allow Logistical Hurdles to Disrupt Participation[/U][/B]: Okay, granted, they could have a mistake here. Their surveys have gotten longer and longer, and the questions are all essentially the same. There is a fatigue factor at play. Though it is also mitigated by the self-selection of passionate people who will work through the survey anyways. But, I can give this to you, it isn't like this point has been made by either of you before right this moment. 4)[B][U] Conflating Attitude and Behavior[/U][/B]: Not a mistake WoTC is making, they aren't asking anything like either of these 5) [B][U]Ignorance of Outliers[/U][/B]: HAHAHAHA, yeah, WoTC isn't making this mistake any time soon. They are WELL aware of their outliers. 6) [B][U]Confirmation Bias[/U][/B]: Very little evidence of this at all, so can't say it is a mistake WoTC is making. 7) [B][U]Correlation for Causation[/U][/B]: Doesn't apply to the questions being asked, so can't be a mistake they are making Finally, "[I]and only a rigorous and critical look can definitively improve your results.[/I]" Something we can say with confidence WoTC has done over the last decade. So, in summary... they may have made ONE of those mistakes. Playtest 7 hasn't changed since I downloaded it. And it won't until... WoTC changes it. Seems like a completely different situation. You don't need a "hard" satisfaction rating, whatever that means. And, yes, you CAN say that there was an 80% satisfaction overall. That math is completely possible to do, using the techniques developed by the field. It is not actually impossible, as has been demonstrated by the people in the field... doing exactly that all the time, across disciplines. IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE You keep insisting it is. It isn't. They are capable of taking all their results and getting a single percentage. You are wrong about this. Asking a question directly is what they are doing, then using the answer to that question to determine step two. You can't declare their questions are wrong because they are using the answer to determine something, and then declare they are "indirectly" asking a question they are not asking. You keep reading into their survey things that are not there, to justify your declarations that was is there is flawed. That isn't how this works. Yes, they announce the percentage of "We like this". Then they use that data to determine if they should reiterate something. BUT THEY DO NOT ASK IF WE WANT THEM TO REITERATE IT. That isn't the goal of the survey. That isn't what they are gathering data on. I've conceded this point before, because it is a non-point. The only reason you two think this is a victory for you is you keep intentionally misrepresenting what WoTC is actually doing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
Top