Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9133558" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>I've shown how their methodology is flawed. The math doesn't lie. </p><p></p><p>Since you, myself, [USER=6801228]@Chaosmancer[/USER], and [USER=7034611]@mamba[/USER] all have different subjective experiences, on a 1-100 scale we are going to have different numbers that qualify as very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied. Compound that by thousands of people and you have a situation where it's impossible for WotC to correctly identify when a vote on a particular item has a 70% satisfaction rating and when an item has 60% satisfaction rating.</p><p></p><p>Picking a percentage that they know(or at the very least should know) is wrong and assigning it to each of the 4 categories in order to come up with 70% and 60% seems pretty arbitrary to me. Reason says that they shouldn't be using that method since it's guaranteed to be wrong. If they wanted to know whether we voters as a whole were 70% satisfied or 60% satisfied, the should be having us weight things on a scale of 1-100.</p><p></p><p>The chances that they can get within 1% of the correct number are less than 1%, but I'll leave it at 1% for simplicity's sake. The chances of they being within 5% is greater than 5% since people are unlikely to be satisfied at 5% or dissatisfied at 78%, so they can guess closer at a +/- 5% error rate, but I don't know the exact percentage. However, when they are using specific percentages like 70% and 60% to have an ability succeed or qualify for another incarnation of an ability, even a 5% error rate is way too large.</p><p></p><p>The best that they can do is to tell us what percentage of people are satisfied vs. what percentage are dissatisfied, which only requires a binary are you satisfied or dissatisfied. Not only that, but it completely ignores everyone who is dissatisfied, but likes the ability enough to want another iteration of the ability to vote on, so none of those people contribute to the 60% number required for WotC to give another iteration of an ability.</p><p></p><p>Further, I linked the type of poll WotC is using and showed that they are making 3 or 4(I don't remember which and am too tired this early to go check) of the common mistakes companies make that result in outcomes that are wrong.</p><p></p><p>Now, you are correct that I'm more likely be productive by telling WotC directly about their mistakes, but I enjoy debates here on this forum. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9133558, member: 23751"] I've shown how their methodology is flawed. The math doesn't lie. Since you, myself, [USER=6801228]@Chaosmancer[/USER], and [USER=7034611]@mamba[/USER] all have different subjective experiences, on a 1-100 scale we are going to have different numbers that qualify as very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied. Compound that by thousands of people and you have a situation where it's impossible for WotC to correctly identify when a vote on a particular item has a 70% satisfaction rating and when an item has 60% satisfaction rating. Picking a percentage that they know(or at the very least should know) is wrong and assigning it to each of the 4 categories in order to come up with 70% and 60% seems pretty arbitrary to me. Reason says that they shouldn't be using that method since it's guaranteed to be wrong. If they wanted to know whether we voters as a whole were 70% satisfied or 60% satisfied, the should be having us weight things on a scale of 1-100. The chances that they can get within 1% of the correct number are less than 1%, but I'll leave it at 1% for simplicity's sake. The chances of they being within 5% is greater than 5% since people are unlikely to be satisfied at 5% or dissatisfied at 78%, so they can guess closer at a +/- 5% error rate, but I don't know the exact percentage. However, when they are using specific percentages like 70% and 60% to have an ability succeed or qualify for another incarnation of an ability, even a 5% error rate is way too large. The best that they can do is to tell us what percentage of people are satisfied vs. what percentage are dissatisfied, which only requires a binary are you satisfied or dissatisfied. Not only that, but it completely ignores everyone who is dissatisfied, but likes the ability enough to want another iteration of the ability to vote on, so none of those people contribute to the 60% number required for WotC to give another iteration of an ability. Further, I linked the type of poll WotC is using and showed that they are making 3 or 4(I don't remember which and am too tired this early to go check) of the common mistakes companies make that result in outcomes that are wrong. Now, you are correct that I'm more likely be productive by telling WotC directly about their mistakes, but I enjoy debates here on this forum. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
Top