Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mirrorrorrim" data-source="post: 9133655" data-attributes="member: 7040132">All this Rules-Lawyerly mathemagical talk feels little more than words in the wind. Wizards has never said that there is an extremely strict feedback regimen that tied their hands when it came to design. I've paid attention to their communications and I completely understand that they have all the freedom in the world to take ratings, and written feedback, and make decisions based on any of that. If they go another way than what I want, or don't iterate on a design I like (like druid templates), that is their prerogative and I was not misled. I may not like their results at times but it is not a mistake compared to their philosophy. They have a lot to juggle, and only they see the written feedback together in context. Maybe larger numbers of people made some very good written points that warrant not moving forward with designs that had a 70% rating. They've also said that some rules may reappear in the future as other options, even if they don't fit in the 2024 PH. It's fine. They aren't incompetent. Designing and writing a book is art. The science and math of it matters more in balancing the content within, less the composition of the artwork as a whole.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mirrorrorrim, post: 9133655, member: 7040132"] All this Rules-Lawyerly mathemagical talk feels little more than words in the wind. Wizards has never said that there is an extremely strict feedback regimen that tied their hands when it came to design. I've paid attention to their communications and I completely understand that they have all the freedom in the world to take ratings, and written feedback, and make decisions based on any of that. If they go another way than what I want, or don't iterate on a design I like (like druid templates), that is their prerogative and I was not misled. I may not like their results at times but it is not a mistake compared to their philosophy. They have a lot to juggle, and only they see the written feedback together in context. Maybe larger numbers of people made some very good written points that warrant not moving forward with designs that had a 70% rating. They've also said that some rules may reappear in the future as other options, even if they don't fit in the 2024 PH. It's fine. They aren't incompetent. Designing and writing a book is art. The science and math of it matters more in balancing the content within, less the composition of the artwork as a whole. [/QUOTE]

Verification