Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4972376" data-attributes="member: 2011">I want versatility with a PC.I don't want vastly superior multiclass PCs.As an example, I wouldn't probably bitch about the multiclass rules too much if the original rules had been the current hybrid rules combined with allowing the Hybrid Talent feat to be taken multiple times. In fact, I probably would have liked that to be the rules.In that case, single class PCs have the strength of the niche and more feats, hybrid PCs have the versatility.Even as is, there are many aspects of Hybrid PCs that are fairly lame, even if someone were to allow Hybrid Talent multiple times.But something like that was what I was looking for with 4E Multiclassing: Dualclassing. I want to play a Cleric/Ranger. Ok, do so.With the rules as is (without houseruling), that's not possible or even close. But, that is what I would like to see. And in my own game, I can houserule Hybrids real easy. So, no harm no foul.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4972376, member: 2011"] I want versatility with a PC. I don't want vastly superior multiclass PCs. As an example, I wouldn't probably bitch about the multiclass rules too much if the original rules had been the current hybrid rules combined with allowing the Hybrid Talent feat to be taken multiple times. In fact, I probably would have liked that to be the rules. In that case, single class PCs have the strength of the niche and more feats, hybrid PCs have the versatility. Even as is, there are many aspects of Hybrid PCs that are fairly lame, even if someone were to allow Hybrid Talent multiple times. But something like that was what I was looking for with 4E Multiclassing: Dualclassing. I want to play a Cleric/Ranger. Ok, do so. With the rules as is (without houseruling), that's not possible or even close. But, that is what I would like to see. And in my own game, I can houserule Hybrids real easy. So, no harm no foul. [/QUOTE]

Verification