Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hanez" data-source="post: 5778803" data-attributes="member: 82160">Disagree.I like playing the charismatic illusionist sorceror  whose not always good in combat, but comes through in clutch moments.  I think D&D needs a range of choices on the combat and non combat scale.  I think it is perfectly fine to play the "Taku like SMASH character" barbarian, who is great at combat and less so at other things.  I think the designers have to put effort into making a range of character choices that fit archetypes that a range of players want to play.I think Combat and NonCombat should be linked, players should have to make choices, I want to be better at this, and worse at that.  That might include picking someone who does less damage but gets more skills.  Theres nothing wrong with that.</blockquote>