Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Classes ... Much Less Flexible than Advertised
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="franzel" data-source="post: 4071884" data-attributes="member: 14808"><p>What are you looking for the smart rogue to do? And in which previous editions do you feel that your concept of the smart rogue was given justice? I'm just curious as a basis for comparison.</p><p></p><p>In 3e/3.5, smart rogues were just that. Smart. Smart rogues were skill-based characters. They had a high INT, which gave them more skill points and they were better at the INT-based skills. Out of six 10th+ level powers, one had to do with skills: Skill Mastery.</p><p></p><p>So far in 4e, the only indication we have how INT will apply to Rogues is the line in Races & Classes where Mike Mearls said that rogues would add their INT bonus to all skill checks so that's certainly an indication that they value the "smart," skilled rogue. We do not know if a high INT provides more starting skills, independent of class.</p><p></p><p>And for prestige classes, there are a few classes like the Spymaster or the Virtuoso (or the skill trick PrCs from Complete Scoundrel). I think the primary function of a SMART rogue, at least to me, is as a master of disguise and multiple identities. In 3.5, there weren't any great, well-integrated attempts. For 4e, it would almost certainly have to tie into the social combat system which we won't see until the books are out (or at least that's what WotC has said). For all we know, there will be the concept of a Trick attack (a la Torg).</p><p></p><p>A master of disguise-type rogue _could_ be handled as a paragon path, but that's pure speculation. We have no evidence one way or the other.</p><p></p><p>In 2e or 1e, I don't think the concept was catered to at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="franzel, post: 4071884, member: 14808"] What are you looking for the smart rogue to do? And in which previous editions do you feel that your concept of the smart rogue was given justice? I'm just curious as a basis for comparison. In 3e/3.5, smart rogues were just that. Smart. Smart rogues were skill-based characters. They had a high INT, which gave them more skill points and they were better at the INT-based skills. Out of six 10th+ level powers, one had to do with skills: Skill Mastery. So far in 4e, the only indication we have how INT will apply to Rogues is the line in Races & Classes where Mike Mearls said that rogues would add their INT bonus to all skill checks so that's certainly an indication that they value the "smart," skilled rogue. We do not know if a high INT provides more starting skills, independent of class. And for prestige classes, there are a few classes like the Spymaster or the Virtuoso (or the skill trick PrCs from Complete Scoundrel). I think the primary function of a SMART rogue, at least to me, is as a master of disguise and multiple identities. In 3.5, there weren't any great, well-integrated attempts. For 4e, it would almost certainly have to tie into the social combat system which we won't see until the books are out (or at least that's what WotC has said). For all we know, there will be the concept of a Trick attack (a la Torg). A master of disguise-type rogue _could_ be handled as a paragon path, but that's pure speculation. We have no evidence one way or the other. In 2e or 1e, I don't think the concept was catered to at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Classes ... Much Less Flexible than Advertised
Top