Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Classes, Subclasses, and Object Oriented Programming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6180907" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>I thought that became the standard rule.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Because" isn't a reason at all. And, I am trying to figure out if it's just tradition, or something else. If it's purely tradition, then I am not sure why it's risen to this level of importance with some people.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A lot have already been given, but much of it comes down to streamlining, and fewer sources of magic means you don't need to run concurrent by separate rules for two different sources when there is already tons of overlap between the two. That's not arbitrary.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you should split it when you have a clear distinction. Divine vs. Non-Divine is a clear distinction. I'm not seeing the distinction between the amorphous arcane and the equally amorphous psionic. I keep asking, but it so far seems to come down to tradition and what the best defenders of the split admit to be a fine and vague difference that's hard to explain.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We've been through this. It IS the definition. Unless you can explain another one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is yet another "It's different because!" and "It's tradition".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That was already explained above, and inherent in "intermediary". I don't think anyone has trouble with druids being divine, with nature as the intermediary between deities and the world.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If Sorcerers obtain their source of power from an inherent genetic ability to spontaneously cast spells, WHY is that different from Psions? See if you can answer that question without saying "Because it's different", or "Because past editions said so". What's the REASON it's different?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because they're really just sorcerers. IE, they are spontaneous casters rather than studied ones.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. Clerics use deity-magic, and don't memorize spells from books. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Arcane /= divine because divine is sourced to deities and arcane is not. That IS a difference. It's not a "because" answer, and it's not a "tradition" answer, it's an actual reason.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The question is, why are psions not sorcerers? Discard wizards - wizards are not spontaneous casters. So, why are they not sorcerers?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6180907, member: 2525"] I thought that became the standard rule. "Because" isn't a reason at all. And, I am trying to figure out if it's just tradition, or something else. If it's purely tradition, then I am not sure why it's risen to this level of importance with some people. A lot have already been given, but much of it comes down to streamlining, and fewer sources of magic means you don't need to run concurrent by separate rules for two different sources when there is already tons of overlap between the two. That's not arbitrary. I think you should split it when you have a clear distinction. Divine vs. Non-Divine is a clear distinction. I'm not seeing the distinction between the amorphous arcane and the equally amorphous psionic. I keep asking, but it so far seems to come down to tradition and what the best defenders of the split admit to be a fine and vague difference that's hard to explain. We've been through this. It IS the definition. Unless you can explain another one. This is yet another "It's different because!" and "It's tradition". That was already explained above, and inherent in "intermediary". I don't think anyone has trouble with druids being divine, with nature as the intermediary between deities and the world. If Sorcerers obtain their source of power from an inherent genetic ability to spontaneously cast spells, WHY is that different from Psions? See if you can answer that question without saying "Because it's different", or "Because past editions said so". What's the REASON it's different? Because they're really just sorcerers. IE, they are spontaneous casters rather than studied ones. Nope. Clerics use deity-magic, and don't memorize spells from books. Arcane /= divine because divine is sourced to deities and arcane is not. That IS a difference. It's not a "because" answer, and it's not a "tradition" answer, it's an actual reason. The question is, why are psions not sorcerers? Discard wizards - wizards are not spontaneous casters. So, why are they not sorcerers? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Classes, Subclasses, and Object Oriented Programming
Top