Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Classic dungeons: What makes them great?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 3741834" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>I think I would agree that, in comparison to what they were fighting, 1e characters were tougher than 3e characters, at least in the low- to mid-level ranges. There is a difference, however, in dying due to player choices and dying due to bad die rolls where there is an expectation of an encounter being "balanced". IMHO, at least. When people say that older editions were more "difficult", I believe that they mean "more difficult for the players in terms of complexity of decision-making during play" not "more difficult for the characters".</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure that 1e was more complex in terms of decision-making during play. There is a lot of decision-making in 3e....too much in some cases. I do think, however, that 3e has replaced some of the "fun" decision making (should we venture into the lower levels?) with "chore" decision making (what buffs shall we stack to gain the maximum effect?). This might well be a product of 2e, thought, with its emphasis on set story modules over sandbox style play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is a difference between 1e plotlines, which were easy to change/manipulate/ignore, and <em>some</em> 3e plotlines. The early 3e modules (Forge of Fury, for example) had plotlines similar to those of the old modules. A situational plotline says "Here's the bad guys, where they live, what they are doing, and some ways to get the PCs involved". In the event of a tournament module, that plotline generally starts with the PCs involved due to DM fiat. If there are "win conditions" for tournament play, that also affects how the module is played within that context. Other than that, though, the PCs are pretty much able to do whatever they like. The doors are wide open.</p><p></p><p>A more constraining plotline contains stronger railroading elements, and assumes that the PCs will take certain actions. Encounters occur in sequence, each building a "story" that forces the PCs to take certain actions or abandon the plotline. Some 1e DMs tried to run modules this same way; my worst experience in 1e as a player was in A1, where the DM didn't take kindly to my trying to circumvent some of the encounters.</p><p></p><p>These are different types of play experiences, and I tend to think that having some of each in a campaign leads to the most fun. Some of the 2e Ravenloft modules were good for this (Feast of Goblyns, if memory serves). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not as linear as you might think. The first time I ran this, the party bypassed much of the dungeon by finding the villian's escape route, and attacked her by surprise from the secret door.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>1e had plenty of rules, but the rules in 1e were the provence of the DM, who decided what got used, what got ignored, and under what circumstances any rule would apply. As has been pointed out more often than rabbits mate, almost no one played AD&D 1e by the RAW. As the RAW contradicted itself, this was possibly impossible. No player could know the rules in play in any given encounter, even if he memorized the DMG, which de-emphasized the rules from the players' perspective. Although 1e had a lot of rules, it didn't <em>play</em> or <em>feel</em> like it had a lot of rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, but while Rule 0 <em>exists</em> in every addition, Rule 0 was a vital principle of 1e, as Gary pointed out in his introduction to the 1e PHB.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 3741834, member: 18280"] I think I would agree that, in comparison to what they were fighting, 1e characters were tougher than 3e characters, at least in the low- to mid-level ranges. There is a difference, however, in dying due to player choices and dying due to bad die rolls where there is an expectation of an encounter being "balanced". IMHO, at least. When people say that older editions were more "difficult", I believe that they mean "more difficult for the players in terms of complexity of decision-making during play" not "more difficult for the characters". I'm not sure that 1e was more complex in terms of decision-making during play. There is a lot of decision-making in 3e....too much in some cases. I do think, however, that 3e has replaced some of the "fun" decision making (should we venture into the lower levels?) with "chore" decision making (what buffs shall we stack to gain the maximum effect?). This might well be a product of 2e, thought, with its emphasis on set story modules over sandbox style play. There is a difference between 1e plotlines, which were easy to change/manipulate/ignore, and [i]some[/i] 3e plotlines. The early 3e modules (Forge of Fury, for example) had plotlines similar to those of the old modules. A situational plotline says "Here's the bad guys, where they live, what they are doing, and some ways to get the PCs involved". In the event of a tournament module, that plotline generally starts with the PCs involved due to DM fiat. If there are "win conditions" for tournament play, that also affects how the module is played within that context. Other than that, though, the PCs are pretty much able to do whatever they like. The doors are wide open. A more constraining plotline contains stronger railroading elements, and assumes that the PCs will take certain actions. Encounters occur in sequence, each building a "story" that forces the PCs to take certain actions or abandon the plotline. Some 1e DMs tried to run modules this same way; my worst experience in 1e as a player was in A1, where the DM didn't take kindly to my trying to circumvent some of the encounters. These are different types of play experiences, and I tend to think that having some of each in a campaign leads to the most fun. Some of the 2e Ravenloft modules were good for this (Feast of Goblyns, if memory serves). Not as linear as you might think. The first time I ran this, the party bypassed much of the dungeon by finding the villian's escape route, and attacked her by surprise from the secret door. 1e had plenty of rules, but the rules in 1e were the provence of the DM, who decided what got used, what got ignored, and under what circumstances any rule would apply. As has been pointed out more often than rabbits mate, almost no one played AD&D 1e by the RAW. As the RAW contradicted itself, this was possibly impossible. No player could know the rules in play in any given encounter, even if he memorized the DMG, which de-emphasized the rules from the players' perspective. Although 1e had a lot of rules, it didn't [i]play[/i] or [i]feel[/i] like it had a lot of rules. Yes, but while Rule 0 [i]exists[/i] in every addition, Rule 0 was a vital principle of 1e, as Gary pointed out in his introduction to the 1e PHB. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Classic dungeons: What makes them great?
Top