Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sadras" data-source="post: 6377813" data-attributes="member: 6688277">Okay perhaps I wasn't clear enough, although @<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=5889" target="_blank">Stalker0</a> mentioned it as a point and you dismissed it quite quickly surprisingly, and IMHO, didn't appear to give it much thought.The point I was trying to make: Often a party might hire out the services of (and these are NOT side quests)...<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">an artisan for their services (blacksmith, cartographer, scribe, tracker...etc)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> a person knowledgeable in a specific field (sage, fortune-teller, priest for divine guidance...etc)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">an alchemist or wizard to identify items or commission to enchant/restore a specific item...etc</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">a healer</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">a merchant for trade goods</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">a captain to gain passage on his vessel...etc</li> </ul>My point is, if all these things are acceptable to you, as they should be (refer page 159 PHB 5E - which includes hiring the services of spell casters), then: 1) Why do you raise such objection for seeking out the services of a healer for the wound effects of a clay golem? 2) How is this different to seeking out the assistance of a cleric to cure a party member for lycanthropy? or even to resurrect a fallen party member?3) Are you also against a party of fighters who seek to reverse the petrification of one of their own after having encountered a medusa? or to silver their weapons when dealing against lycanthropes?   Where am I misunderstanding you? Because I honestly do not see the logic behind your argument.</blockquote>

Verification