Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave and AOO: What is the problem?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lamoni" data-source="post: 1805801" data-attributes="member: 12680"><p>I am quite confused that you can still be confused by it.</p><p>Let me add another example to the numberless examples already given.</p><p></p><p>Characters: BBEG, Fred the Fighter, Mike Mook.</p><p></p><p>Fred is fighting BBEG.</p><p>Fred hits BBEG</p><p>BBEG hits Fred</p><p>Mike tries to disarm Fred</p><p>Fred takes AoO against Mike (who doesn't die)</p><p>(Next round)</p><p>Fred hits Mike and drops him</p><p>Fred makes cleave attempt and hits BBEG</p><p>BBEG hits Fred</p><p></p><p>This example showed an AoO. It also showed a Cleave. No one that is saying that Cleave doesn't make sense with an AoO would have a problem with this scenario. The AoO works just like it is supposed to. We LIKE AoO. The Cleave also works just like it is supposed to (the fighter gets an extra attack). We LIKE Cleave. The thing that we say we dislike is the COMBINATION of Cleave with an AoO. Many people have repeated that several times, but you always effectively say, "No, you still just have a problem with Cleave."</p><p></p><p>In the situation I described above, Mike still gets use of his AoO. He also gets an extra attack from cleave. In the other examples that describe why the combination doesn't make sense, Mike would be getting a third attack against BBEG in two rounds instead of just two. He gets punished by what Mike does. No, it isn't the same as a fireball. The invisible person gets damaged by the fireball based on there being a fireball there. The BBEG got damaged because the fighter was distracted by this other stupid guy trying to disarm him.</p><p></p><p>You have said yourself that it is a very rare occurance. Therefore would it really be a problem to remove the cleave ability from happening with AoO's? I say no. Then you don't have the problem with someone summoning mice like in the most recent example by reanjr. Of course most DM's would just say "No, I don't think so" to a player who tried to do that, but according to the RAW, it is perfectly legal.</p><p></p><p>We have explained why we don't like it (which was the topic of the thread). You obviously think we just don't like cleave. I'll continue to play with cleave in my games. We'll also continue to take AoO's. No, I don't think it is unbalanced (unless a player tries to abuse it with the mice trick). Yes, I still think it is a silly rule. I just hope you continue to enjoy your games and I'll continue to enjoy mine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lamoni, post: 1805801, member: 12680"] I am quite confused that you can still be confused by it. Let me add another example to the numberless examples already given. Characters: BBEG, Fred the Fighter, Mike Mook. Fred is fighting BBEG. Fred hits BBEG BBEG hits Fred Mike tries to disarm Fred Fred takes AoO against Mike (who doesn't die) (Next round) Fred hits Mike and drops him Fred makes cleave attempt and hits BBEG BBEG hits Fred This example showed an AoO. It also showed a Cleave. No one that is saying that Cleave doesn't make sense with an AoO would have a problem with this scenario. The AoO works just like it is supposed to. We LIKE AoO. The Cleave also works just like it is supposed to (the fighter gets an extra attack). We LIKE Cleave. The thing that we say we dislike is the COMBINATION of Cleave with an AoO. Many people have repeated that several times, but you always effectively say, "No, you still just have a problem with Cleave." In the situation I described above, Mike still gets use of his AoO. He also gets an extra attack from cleave. In the other examples that describe why the combination doesn't make sense, Mike would be getting a third attack against BBEG in two rounds instead of just two. He gets punished by what Mike does. No, it isn't the same as a fireball. The invisible person gets damaged by the fireball based on there being a fireball there. The BBEG got damaged because the fighter was distracted by this other stupid guy trying to disarm him. You have said yourself that it is a very rare occurance. Therefore would it really be a problem to remove the cleave ability from happening with AoO's? I say no. Then you don't have the problem with someone summoning mice like in the most recent example by reanjr. Of course most DM's would just say "No, I don't think so" to a player who tried to do that, but according to the RAW, it is perfectly legal. We have explained why we don't like it (which was the topic of the thread). You obviously think we just don't like cleave. I'll continue to play with cleave in my games. We'll also continue to take AoO's. No, I don't think it is unbalanced (unless a player tries to abuse it with the mice trick). Yes, I still think it is a silly rule. I just hope you continue to enjoy your games and I'll continue to enjoy mine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave and AOO: What is the problem?
Top