Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave and Attacks of Opportunity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pielorinho" data-source="post: 1314339" data-attributes="member: 259"><p>I'm having trouble following you; would you mind proofreading posts before submitting them? I think there must be suffixes or whole words missing or misplaced.</p><p> </p><p>That said, who mentioned a chained or helpless impostor? That's not what I was talking about.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Aside: a "slow though fool proof method it doesn't guarantee success"? The whole point of a foolproof method is that it guarantees success. This is an example of where your post really confused me.</p><p> </p><p>It doesn't take a full minute to do this trick: it takes two, not necessarily consecutive rounds. Round 1: cast bless. Round 2: cast detect magic. As long as the rest of the group is out of your detection arc, and as long as the subject isn't under other spells, you've got your answer immediately on casting detect magic. This is not a trick to use in combat, sure, but my point isn't about combat: it's about resolving allegiances in a mystery-heavy, intrigue-laden adventure, in which combats are rarer than average.</p><p> </p><p>A persistant foe might watch the group to figure out when the spell is cast, but that only works if it's cast on a regular basis. Again, that's not the situation I'm talking about: I'm talking about casting it to deal with specific suspicions. I don't want a foolproof method to deal with such suspicions.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Hardly wasteful, if an orison and a first level spell enable the priests to detect any infiltrators with absolute success; on the contrary, a sensible god would <strong>demand </strong>the use of this spell combo by the faithful.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>According to the rules, yes. Gods don't micromanage; they delegate. That's what clerics are for. They're the middle managers of the holy hierarchy. If a cleric decides that the god hatin man is an ally and should be subject to bless, then that god hatin man is subject to bless. Maybe at some point the cleric's boss will have words with her, but there's nothing in the rules to suggest that the gods are second-guessing every single spell choice their clerics make.</p><p> </p><p>Daniel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pielorinho, post: 1314339, member: 259"] I'm having trouble following you; would you mind proofreading posts before submitting them? I think there must be suffixes or whole words missing or misplaced. That said, who mentioned a chained or helpless impostor? That's not what I was talking about. Aside: a "slow though fool proof method it doesn't guarantee success"? The whole point of a foolproof method is that it guarantees success. This is an example of where your post really confused me. It doesn't take a full minute to do this trick: it takes two, not necessarily consecutive rounds. Round 1: cast bless. Round 2: cast detect magic. As long as the rest of the group is out of your detection arc, and as long as the subject isn't under other spells, you've got your answer immediately on casting detect magic. This is not a trick to use in combat, sure, but my point isn't about combat: it's about resolving allegiances in a mystery-heavy, intrigue-laden adventure, in which combats are rarer than average. A persistant foe might watch the group to figure out when the spell is cast, but that only works if it's cast on a regular basis. Again, that's not the situation I'm talking about: I'm talking about casting it to deal with specific suspicions. I don't want a foolproof method to deal with such suspicions. Hardly wasteful, if an orison and a first level spell enable the priests to detect any infiltrators with absolute success; on the contrary, a sensible god would [b]demand [/b]the use of this spell combo by the faithful. According to the rules, yes. Gods don't micromanage; they delegate. That's what clerics are for. They're the middle managers of the holy hierarchy. If a cleric decides that the god hatin man is an ally and should be subject to bless, then that god hatin man is subject to bless. Maybe at some point the cleric's boss will have words with her, but there's nothing in the rules to suggest that the gods are second-guessing every single spell choice their clerics make. Daniel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave and Attacks of Opportunity
Top