Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave and Full Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hong" data-source="post: 224275" data-attributes="member: 537"><p>The job of the Sage is to clarify situations where the rules are ambiguous. He isn't going to be consulted in situations where the rules are clear-cut, because there's no need.</p><p></p><p>If the rules are ambiguous enough to start a war in the first place, then appealing to the Sage is hardly going to end it, because that's not how flamewars work. All that happens is that one party puts on their "Skip agrees with me therefore I'm right" hat, and the other party puts on their "Skip disagrees with me therefore he's wrong" hat. None of this is a reflection on Skip himself, but has to do with the nature of online discourse.</p><p></p><p>By and large, I think Skip does a pretty good job, and I think most people here would agree with me. And yes, I've put on my "Skip disagrees with me therefore he's wrong" hat a few times.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Get off your high horse already. Just because you've put on your "Skip disagrees with me therefore he's wrong" hat doesn't mean the rules aren't ambiguous. It certainly doesn't make everyone else who disagrees with you a powergamer.</p><p></p><p>In fact, a feature of Sage Advice that more than a few people have noted is that if there's a choice between powering up an ability and nerfing it, then more than likely Skip will go for nerfing it. He seems to have an aversion to power inflation, something possibly resulting from 20+ years of watching the game evolve.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hong, post: 224275, member: 537"] The job of the Sage is to clarify situations where the rules are ambiguous. He isn't going to be consulted in situations where the rules are clear-cut, because there's no need. If the rules are ambiguous enough to start a war in the first place, then appealing to the Sage is hardly going to end it, because that's not how flamewars work. All that happens is that one party puts on their "Skip agrees with me therefore I'm right" hat, and the other party puts on their "Skip disagrees with me therefore he's wrong" hat. None of this is a reflection on Skip himself, but has to do with the nature of online discourse. By and large, I think Skip does a pretty good job, and I think most people here would agree with me. And yes, I've put on my "Skip disagrees with me therefore he's wrong" hat a few times. Get off your high horse already. Just because you've put on your "Skip disagrees with me therefore he's wrong" hat doesn't mean the rules aren't ambiguous. It certainly doesn't make everyone else who disagrees with you a powergamer. In fact, a feature of Sage Advice that more than a few people have noted is that if there's a choice between powering up an ability and nerfing it, then more than likely Skip will go for nerfing it. He seems to have an aversion to power inflation, something possibly resulting from 20+ years of watching the game evolve. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave and Full Attack
Top