Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave - Automatic hits on 2nd target?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NorthSaber" data-source="post: 4337854" data-attributes="member: 69975"><p>This edition of the game has a lot of things that don't make sense, but make gameplay faster. Cleave could have been done in 3e style where you make a totally new attack roll and damage roll, but that slows down the game, which is something nobody wants. So 4e made a few logical sacrifices - the end result is 99% the same, and so much faster to play.</p><p></p><p>Automatic damage is one of those weird ones. Our group faced these tiny crab creatures - totally harmless minions with a weak attack, but if you started next to one of them, you took automatic damage from each of them. Yikes! Didn't matter if you wore platemail or if you were encased in 3" of concrete, those SOBs got through. </p><p></p><p>4e, more than any other game system I've seen, requires for the DM and the players to work together in coming up with cool explanations of what really happened (i.e. provide appropriate fluff) and what the hp loss really means. </p><p></p><p>For instance, the cleave might not be a physical hit - you could just as well explain it as the enemy becoming demoralized as you slash his friend's entrails on his face. </p><p></p><p>Come and Get It has similar problems, as it also draws near invisible rogue-type enemies and weak wizard-type enemies who would rather stay as far away from you as possible, and it is left as a mutual exercise for the DM and the players to come up with an explanation as to how this end result came to be. Did someone push the wizard? Did the fighter feign weakness so the rogue saw an opportunity to strike? </p><p></p><p>I don't really think it's a problem but it requires a different approach to the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NorthSaber, post: 4337854, member: 69975"] This edition of the game has a lot of things that don't make sense, but make gameplay faster. Cleave could have been done in 3e style where you make a totally new attack roll and damage roll, but that slows down the game, which is something nobody wants. So 4e made a few logical sacrifices - the end result is 99% the same, and so much faster to play. Automatic damage is one of those weird ones. Our group faced these tiny crab creatures - totally harmless minions with a weak attack, but if you started next to one of them, you took automatic damage from each of them. Yikes! Didn't matter if you wore platemail or if you were encased in 3" of concrete, those SOBs got through. 4e, more than any other game system I've seen, requires for the DM and the players to work together in coming up with cool explanations of what really happened (i.e. provide appropriate fluff) and what the hp loss really means. For instance, the cleave might not be a physical hit - you could just as well explain it as the enemy becoming demoralized as you slash his friend's entrails on his face. Come and Get It has similar problems, as it also draws near invisible rogue-type enemies and weak wizard-type enemies who would rather stay as far away from you as possible, and it is left as a mutual exercise for the DM and the players to come up with an explanation as to how this end result came to be. Did someone push the wizard? Did the fighter feign weakness so the rogue saw an opportunity to strike? I don't really think it's a problem but it requires a different approach to the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave - Automatic hits on 2nd target?
Top