Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave on an AoO?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 3382757" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>Good point. I never liked the one attack roll = one swing model, anyway.</p><p></p><p>That's another distraction-based argument, so it's time for the invisible dire lemmings again. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>The extra melee attack is not the issue for me. Using A, B and C again:</p><p></p><p>I have no problems with C dropping B and Cleaving into A on his turn. Since C could have ignored B and attacked A anyway, A isn't any worse off in terms of the number of attack rolls C makes against him even if C happened to drop B as well.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't even have a problem if A and B both provoked AOOs from C, and C dropped B and Cleaved into A with his AOO. The same reason applies. Since C could have ignored B and used his AOO on A, A isn't any worse off in terms of the number of attack rolls C makes against him even if C happened to drop B as well.</p><p></p><p>Where I would have a problem is if A did not provoke an AOO from C, but B did, and C dropped B with his AOO and Cleaved into A. This gives C an extra attack roll against A which is effectively an AOO against A even though A did nothing to provoke one. </p><p></p><p>Of course, this is allowed because of the way that Cleave is worded in the rules. If I were to re-write Cleave for my campaign, I would define it as the ability to make attacks so powerful that they drop weak foes effortlessly. In game terms, the effect of the feat would be that the first time you drop an opponent in a round, the attack you used to drop an opponent effectively becomes a non-action, and you can continue to take actions as if you had not used an action to drop that opponent. This means that you cannot Cleave off an AOO, but if your AOO drops an opponent, it does not count towards the number of AOOs you make in a round. It also means that you can do some things that you cannot currently do with Cleave, e.g. drop a weak foe and then charge another opponent.</p><p></p><p>I guess what I'm saying is, I have no problems with Cleave granting an extra attack, but the extra attack should be made against the weak foe you dropped, and not against the stronger foe you happen to be fighting at the same time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 3382757, member: 3424"] Good point. I never liked the one attack roll = one swing model, anyway. That's another distraction-based argument, so it's time for the invisible dire lemmings again. :) The extra melee attack is not the issue for me. Using A, B and C again: I have no problems with C dropping B and Cleaving into A on his turn. Since C could have ignored B and attacked A anyway, A isn't any worse off in terms of the number of attack rolls C makes against him even if C happened to drop B as well. I wouldn't even have a problem if A and B both provoked AOOs from C, and C dropped B and Cleaved into A with his AOO. The same reason applies. Since C could have ignored B and used his AOO on A, A isn't any worse off in terms of the number of attack rolls C makes against him even if C happened to drop B as well. Where I would have a problem is if A did not provoke an AOO from C, but B did, and C dropped B with his AOO and Cleaved into A. This gives C an extra attack roll against A which is effectively an AOO against A even though A did nothing to provoke one. Of course, this is allowed because of the way that Cleave is worded in the rules. If I were to re-write Cleave for my campaign, I would define it as the ability to make attacks so powerful that they drop weak foes effortlessly. In game terms, the effect of the feat would be that the first time you drop an opponent in a round, the attack you used to drop an opponent effectively becomes a non-action, and you can continue to take actions as if you had not used an action to drop that opponent. This means that you cannot Cleave off an AOO, but if your AOO drops an opponent, it does not count towards the number of AOOs you make in a round. It also means that you can do some things that you cannot currently do with Cleave, e.g. drop a weak foe and then charge another opponent. I guess what I'm saying is, I have no problems with Cleave granting an extra attack, but the extra attack should be made against the weak foe you dropped, and not against the stronger foe you happen to be fighting at the same time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cleave on an AoO?
Top