Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Clerics and Wisdom
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6860025" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>No, there isn't. Words as you say have meaning. And to be convinced that something is true based on the intellectual arguments of others, is quite often the same as believing it is true based on an authority having presented their argument. That is to say, most people believe that the source of a person's authority is the truth of what they say, and the truth of what they say is made evident by the reasonableness of what they say. Hardly anyone believes that what they believe is unreasonable to believe, and it is unreasonable to believe that someone holds a belief despite believing it to be unreasonable. So for example, a Catholic if they are a pious Catholic believes that the Pope on certain matters is absolutely correct. But they believe that the Pope is absolutely correct, not merely because he is The Pope, but also because on those matters the Pope is divinely inspired to be absolutely perfect in his reasoning, which the Pope will lay out in his teachings. The sort of person likely to take the Pope as being reliable authority, also believes that the Pope is also a reliable intellect who has offered up sufficient intellectual proof.</p><p></p><p>The mistake I usually see made here is the assertion that someone believes the Pope's (or the Church's) teachings only because they are the Pope's and because the Pope has authority, and that therefore they believe these teachings without intellectual investigation. In fact, the Pope himself is acting very much in the same manner as any other scholar, and in outlining a teaching will appeal to reliable authority to show how the teaching conforms with what is considered to be reliably argued and hence already known to be and accepted as truth. I advise you to for example read some GK Chesterton.</p><p></p><p>(Full disclosure. I'm not Catholic. It's just a useful example.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6860025, member: 4937"] No, there isn't. Words as you say have meaning. And to be convinced that something is true based on the intellectual arguments of others, is quite often the same as believing it is true based on an authority having presented their argument. That is to say, most people believe that the source of a person's authority is the truth of what they say, and the truth of what they say is made evident by the reasonableness of what they say. Hardly anyone believes that what they believe is unreasonable to believe, and it is unreasonable to believe that someone holds a belief despite believing it to be unreasonable. So for example, a Catholic if they are a pious Catholic believes that the Pope on certain matters is absolutely correct. But they believe that the Pope is absolutely correct, not merely because he is The Pope, but also because on those matters the Pope is divinely inspired to be absolutely perfect in his reasoning, which the Pope will lay out in his teachings. The sort of person likely to take the Pope as being reliable authority, also believes that the Pope is also a reliable intellect who has offered up sufficient intellectual proof. The mistake I usually see made here is the assertion that someone believes the Pope's (or the Church's) teachings only because they are the Pope's and because the Pope has authority, and that therefore they believe these teachings without intellectual investigation. In fact, the Pope himself is acting very much in the same manner as any other scholar, and in outlining a teaching will appeal to reliable authority to show how the teaching conforms with what is considered to be reliably argued and hence already known to be and accepted as truth. I advise you to for example read some GK Chesterton. (Full disclosure. I'm not Catholic. It's just a useful example.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Clerics and Wisdom
Top