Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 6862761" data-attributes="member: 5890">Your definition of read is synonymous with investigate, which ties to int.Your definition of understand is not quite right: you're referring to 'being understanding', which makes much more sense. Unfortunately whether a character is understanding or not is entirely a roleplaying choice, not a matter of stats.Your definition of care again is a description of a course of character action.Then why did you insist in the first place? You're the one who started defining words and terms.Outside of what? The argument? The rules? To be sure, I'm not sure it's possible to argue about the rules from within them, and I'm not sure how I can be participating in an argument that I'm outside of.Sure, but the inevitable counter to this appeal to authority is to state that authority != correctness.How so? Selfishness and selflessness have nothing to do with class - again we're in pure roleplaying territory. I could easily have a warlock who does nothing for himself and everything for his patron, making him supremely selfless. #JustSayinYoureWrong</blockquote>