Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scion" data-source="post: 2346646" data-attributes="member: 5777">I dont see any line like that, but perhaps I missed it, feel free to point it out. (ahh, I just found what you are talking about and yes, I feel that you are way overstating your case. saying that such a call would be socially retarded is a bit off putting, but does not push to the point you took it)In this case I see absolutely no reason for the dm to be snippy. The player sees this, 'cleric: gains 3+cha mod in turnings per day', 'paladin: gains 3+cha mod in turnings per day', and then thinks, 'well hey, I multiclassed and took enough levels in paly, that must be one of the perks'. Then the dm comes in and says he is wrong about that, the player asks why and to be shown in the rules.At this point no one should be upset, no one should think that they are being unfairly punished. All that should happen is finding the appropriate text and saying, 'here is why'. Getting out a piece of paper and writing, 'I am the dm' on it would be the wrong thing to do. Very wrong. Horribly wrong. Slapping someone in the face whenever they ask a simple question is just a Bad Move (tm) imo.So yes, from a players point of view it could be changing the rules at whim, especially if the dm could find nothing to back up his claim. The player saw something that makes sense without further rules input, the dm said it was wrong. One of the two is incorrect, just because one is the dm is completely unimportant.</blockquote>

Verification