Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Clerics without gods = huh?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 535149" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>Hmmm....Psion what you seem to be saying to me is "Because I play in a world where Gods are required for clerical spells and most people I know or have heard about do, that should be the point addressed in the rulebook, and giving divine magic without gods should be relegated to an option, but not an assumption."</p><p></p><p>....I'd say "Who's it hurting by being there?"</p><p></p><p>The domains are balanaced. The default assumption of the implied setting is that belief comes before gods. There's nothing wrong with that way of presenting it. It certainly doesn't invalidate your campaign setting's rules in any way -- you don't play in the implied setting, and the players should understand that you're the DM and have the authority to change things, often on just a whim if you want.</p><p></p><p>There's no need to really cheapen the concept of a godless faith by relegating it to a side bar of having them fooling themselves into being godless. If it doesn't work for your campaign, it doesn't. No biggie.</p><p></p><p>I really don't understand why that means that the rule shouldn't exist. It wasn't made to suit your campaign -- it was made to suit a certain style of generic campaigning. And, in general, the campaign assumes that there's kind of a cycle for how the power of belief flows....from worshiper to concept (in the form of actions and activities in the name of the concept), and from concept back to worshiper (in the form of spells). The concept can, but need not be, embodied in a deific form.</p><p></p><p>So you're different. I don't think the rules should cater to how you happen to play, nor do I think that just because you don't like godless priests that they need to be regulated to a side-bar/optional rule.</p><p></p><p>Mechanically, it's really no different. It's only the campaign flavor that seperates godless preists from the goded. And it's the DM's job to establish flavor for his/her world. If the suggested flavor of the core books isn't important, you, as DM, can change it...it's really not important as long as you want it different.</p><p></p><p>Sorry if I might sound a mite inflamatory up there. I hope I did give a pretty honest representation of your argument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 535149, member: 2067"] Hmmm....Psion what you seem to be saying to me is "Because I play in a world where Gods are required for clerical spells and most people I know or have heard about do, that should be the point addressed in the rulebook, and giving divine magic without gods should be relegated to an option, but not an assumption." ....I'd say "Who's it hurting by being there?" The domains are balanaced. The default assumption of the implied setting is that belief comes before gods. There's nothing wrong with that way of presenting it. It certainly doesn't invalidate your campaign setting's rules in any way -- you don't play in the implied setting, and the players should understand that you're the DM and have the authority to change things, often on just a whim if you want. There's no need to really cheapen the concept of a godless faith by relegating it to a side bar of having them fooling themselves into being godless. If it doesn't work for your campaign, it doesn't. No biggie. I really don't understand why that means that the rule shouldn't exist. It wasn't made to suit your campaign -- it was made to suit a certain style of generic campaigning. And, in general, the campaign assumes that there's kind of a cycle for how the power of belief flows....from worshiper to concept (in the form of actions and activities in the name of the concept), and from concept back to worshiper (in the form of spells). The concept can, but need not be, embodied in a deific form. So you're different. I don't think the rules should cater to how you happen to play, nor do I think that just because you don't like godless priests that they need to be regulated to a side-bar/optional rule. Mechanically, it's really no different. It's only the campaign flavor that seperates godless preists from the goded. And it's the DM's job to establish flavor for his/her world. If the suggested flavor of the core books isn't important, you, as DM, can change it...it's really not important as long as you want it different. Sorry if I might sound a mite inflamatory up there. I hope I did give a pretty honest representation of your argument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Clerics without gods = huh?!
Top