Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cloak of Ugliness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wuyanei" data-source="post: 2260659" data-attributes="member: 28913"><p>Very interesting concept, but the legalese needs some work. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I suggest you phrase the cloak as:</p><p></p><p>'As long as the owner is wearing this cloak, his face will become deformed and grotesque, imposing a -3 penalty to his charisma score.'</p><p></p><p>and</p><p></p><p>'Upon a successful strike, the target of the strike suffers a 1-point charisma penalty for two hours, while the wearer gains a +1 bonus to his charisma for the same duration.'</p><p></p><p>However, IMHO, a meager -1 ability penalty is not worth wasting a standard-action on. I suggest that the '-3 penalty to his charisma score' be changed to:</p><p></p><p> '-3 penalty to all Charisma checks and Charisma-based skill checks'</p><p></p><p>and the effect of the <em>Ugly Strike</em> be changed to:</p><p></p><p>'Upon a successful strike, the target of the strike suffers a 2-point charisma penalty for two hours, while the wearer gains a +1 bonus to to all Charisma checks and Charisma-based skill checks for the same duration. The penality to ability scores caused by a <em>Cloak of Ugliness</em> stacks with itself, but not with any other penalty to ability scores. The penalty due to a Cloak of Ugliness cannot reduce any ability score below 1.'</p><p></p><p>The first change is so that sorcerers, bards and spell-like ability users can still cast spells effectively, even while all social skills suffer what amounts to a -6 penalty to Charisma. Sorcerers have their spells based on their inner personality, not on their looks, so being hideously ugly should not weaken their spells anyways. (Bards still suffer when using their Bard song, ie. Performance skill.)</p><p></p><p>The second is simply to give the cloak a minimum of bite. It's still nothing compaired to RoE, though. And by the time you reach 16 char lvl, save or die spells are flying like hail anyways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wuyanei, post: 2260659, member: 28913"] Very interesting concept, but the legalese needs some work. ;) I suggest you phrase the cloak as: 'As long as the owner is wearing this cloak, his face will become deformed and grotesque, imposing a -3 penalty to his charisma score.' and 'Upon a successful strike, the target of the strike suffers a 1-point charisma penalty for two hours, while the wearer gains a +1 bonus to his charisma for the same duration.' However, IMHO, a meager -1 ability penalty is not worth wasting a standard-action on. I suggest that the '-3 penalty to his charisma score' be changed to: '-3 penalty to all Charisma checks and Charisma-based skill checks' and the effect of the [i]Ugly Strike[/i] be changed to: 'Upon a successful strike, the target of the strike suffers a 2-point charisma penalty for two hours, while the wearer gains a +1 bonus to to all Charisma checks and Charisma-based skill checks for the same duration. The penality to ability scores caused by a [i]Cloak of Ugliness[/i] stacks with itself, but not with any other penalty to ability scores. The penalty due to a Cloak of Ugliness cannot reduce any ability score below 1.' The first change is so that sorcerers, bards and spell-like ability users can still cast spells effectively, even while all social skills suffer what amounts to a -6 penalty to Charisma. Sorcerers have their spells based on their inner personality, not on their looks, so being hideously ugly should not weaken their spells anyways. (Bards still suffer when using their Bard song, ie. Performance skill.) The second is simply to give the cloak a minimum of bite. It's still nothing compaired to RoE, though. And by the time you reach 16 char lvl, save or die spells are flying like hail anyways. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cloak of Ugliness
Top