Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brimshack" data-source="post: 3213358" data-attributes="member: 34694">Given the list that you have just supplied, I am amazed that both the DM nor the player of the cleric have yet to come up with a plausible reason to notice what is going on. Boots and cloaks at least should be noticed, especially if he saw them on an enemy and then the Rogue. A sleight of Hand does not make others stupid. It just means you don't see the transfer. I also think the player is going well beyond selfish and into outright foolishness, and yes I mean that as applying to the player, not just the character. At the very least it would pay to spread the potions around and if he is keeping magic items secret even at the expense of not being able to identify them, then that is letting his priorities get a little messed up.The thing people sometimes forget is it's not just a character. If one person can't accomplish anything because they are behind the curve, then it's a person who suffers not simply a character. Admittedly they suffer boredom so I don't mean to be too meldramatic, it's not a hangin matter. But sometimes people seem to forget there is a real world element to game play, even if it's just an element of frustration. With or without a no-party-conflict rule, players ought to be more considerate.Other Rogue options, heck declare all that yours and lend it out. As time goes on the loans become permanent and the notion that he owns everything in the party becomes a clever piece of campaign flavour. That way he still gets to play the greedy rogue and he takes care of his companions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brimshack, post: 3213358, member: 34694"] Given the list that you have just supplied, I am amazed that both the DM nor the player of the cleric have yet to come up with a plausible reason to notice what is going on. Boots and cloaks at least should be noticed, especially if he saw them on an enemy and then the Rogue. A sleight of Hand does not make others stupid. It just means you don't see the transfer. I also think the player is going well beyond selfish and into outright foolishness, and yes I mean that as applying to the player, not just the character. At the very least it would pay to spread the potions around and if he is keeping magic items secret even at the expense of not being able to identify them, then that is letting his priorities get a little messed up. The thing people sometimes forget is it's not just a character. If one person can't accomplish anything because they are behind the curve, then it's a person who suffers not simply a character. Admittedly they suffer boredom so I don't mean to be too meldramatic, it's not a hangin matter. But sometimes people seem to forget there is a real world element to game play, even if it's just an element of frustration. With or without a no-party-conflict rule, players ought to be more considerate. Other Rogue options, heck declare all that yours and lend it out. As time goes on the loans become permanent and the notion that he owns everything in the party becomes a clever piece of campaign flavour. That way he still gets to play the greedy rogue and he takes care of his companions. [/QUOTE]

Verification