Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
CMP: On its way out?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iwarrior-poet" data-source="post: 3384971" data-attributes="member: 13860"><p>It may have appeared that way, but that is not what I felt. I was never hoping that CMP would perish. I still don't---though to be honest I don't think they will recover and I doubt RPGF will see the light of day (let alone the dataset transfer software that would make it all worth the wait). All I have ever hoped for is that CMP would either produce its product within a responsive time frame---or if not---be very clear about the reasons for missed deadlines. I felt that if CMP was not going to be honest about its current state---than somebody should. That is why I started this thread. When Mynex finally posted his address on the CMP website, it went a long way to addressing many of my concerns/criticisms---hence my change in tone.</p><p></p><p>What you picked up on was my frustration at CMP's numerous blown promises and scraped "potential" release dates (for both RPGF and datasets), in addition to its lack of sincerity in addressing concerns/criticisms about forthcoming products.</p><p></p><p>I spent over $200 on CMP datasets for PCGen----largely on the belief that I would be able to trade them in when RPGF came on the scene (which the folks at CMP made it seem was always just around the corner...)</p><p>So when CMP/WoTC (I blame both) blew this for me and numerous others---I was pretty darn upset.</p><p> </p><p>Even worse, CMP initially tried to insist it had never promised the trade-in. This was probably what escalated my frustration almost past the point of no return. Not only did CMP go back on a very important promise---but they tried to insist they had never made it in the first place... Horrendous. Someone more savvy than me used some sort of technique to call up the previous CMP web page ("way-back machine"---or something like it) that clearly outlined the dataset exchange agreement that CMP had promised, disproving CMP's denial of the deal.</p><p></p><p>On the plus side, CMP's customer support for problems with purchased datasets has been excellent, and I have always said as much.</p><p></p><p>I may have ranted at times, but CMP's lack of credibility and relationship building with loyal customers was infuriating to me and others. So I voiced my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iwarrior-poet, post: 3384971, member: 13860"] It may have appeared that way, but that is not what I felt. I was never hoping that CMP would perish. I still don't---though to be honest I don't think they will recover and I doubt RPGF will see the light of day (let alone the dataset transfer software that would make it all worth the wait). All I have ever hoped for is that CMP would either produce its product within a responsive time frame---or if not---be very clear about the reasons for missed deadlines. I felt that if CMP was not going to be honest about its current state---than somebody should. That is why I started this thread. When Mynex finally posted his address on the CMP website, it went a long way to addressing many of my concerns/criticisms---hence my change in tone. What you picked up on was my frustration at CMP's numerous blown promises and scraped "potential" release dates (for both RPGF and datasets), in addition to its lack of sincerity in addressing concerns/criticisms about forthcoming products. I spent over $200 on CMP datasets for PCGen----largely on the belief that I would be able to trade them in when RPGF came on the scene (which the folks at CMP made it seem was always just around the corner...) So when CMP/WoTC (I blame both) blew this for me and numerous others---I was pretty darn upset. Even worse, CMP initially tried to insist it had never promised the trade-in. This was probably what escalated my frustration almost past the point of no return. Not only did CMP go back on a very important promise---but they tried to insist they had never made it in the first place... Horrendous. Someone more savvy than me used some sort of technique to call up the previous CMP web page ("way-back machine"---or something like it) that clearly outlined the dataset exchange agreement that CMP had promised, disproving CMP's denial of the deal. On the plus side, CMP's customer support for problems with purchased datasets has been excellent, and I have always said as much. I may have ranted at times, but CMP's lack of credibility and relationship building with loyal customers was infuriating to me and others. So I voiced my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
CMP: On its way out?
Top