Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
CMP: On its way out?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheYeti1775" data-source="post: 3401959" data-attributes="member: 20914"><p><strong>Yahoo Group it / plus another thought - rambling</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ya could start a Yahoo Group for ETools Support. Something like PCGen's where people ask the how to and people help each other out. I'm pretty sure if you announced it here you would get quite a few willing to go back and forth with helping each other with tips and all.</p><p></p><p>I know your looking at it from the errata standpoint, but technically without the liscense they couldn't distribute even errata for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>---------------------</p><p>Now for a little Lawful Evil twist in the CMP favor</p><p>---------------------</p><p>Now on a totally different note, when you look at IP stuff and all that. Wouldnt there be an arguement to say that since while under the agreement WOTC gave the permission for CMP to CREATE (keyword here) datasets for their products during that time period. Now I ain't no lawyer thats for sure, but wouldn't that now change the IP of the Datasets to CMP's ownership? as they did create the format and distrubition system for all of it.</p><p></p><p>So wouldn't technically CMP still be in control of stuff THAT CMP CREATED during that time period? Yeah they couldn't put in any errata since then but anything released before the license expired would be fair game for the CMP monkeys.</p><p></p><p>I'm just going to use a car analogy so you all can follow my line of thinking.</p><p>You buy a car.</p><p>By virtue of buying the car you can do what you want with it, raise it lower it, change the front end so it looks completly different. Or even just let it sit.</p><p>Ford or Chevy then decide they no longer want to do business with you.</p><p>They can't stop you from selling that car you already own.</p><p></p><p>By this logic I think CMP is in a very interesting position of not really being unable to tread water. Cause technically they still own the rights for that time period. Just cause they can't create new stuff doesn't mean they can't sell their old datasets. These datasets were created long before the rug was pulled out. Thereby they are CMP datasets, cause there is no way WOTC gave them the data in that format. Maybe LoneJedi can answer that part on how they got data. So unless the data came over in that format, then the IP is now CMP's not WOTC. </p><p></p><p>Now this is just a simple layman's take on it. But if I was on a jury I think I would be leaning on the CMP side if argued like this.</p><p></p><p>Yeti</p><p>They can't take back the</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheYeti1775, post: 3401959, member: 20914"] [b]Yahoo Group it / plus another thought - rambling[/b] Ya could start a Yahoo Group for ETools Support. Something like PCGen's where people ask the how to and people help each other out. I'm pretty sure if you announced it here you would get quite a few willing to go back and forth with helping each other with tips and all. I know your looking at it from the errata standpoint, but technically without the liscense they couldn't distribute even errata for it. --------------------- Now for a little Lawful Evil twist in the CMP favor --------------------- Now on a totally different note, when you look at IP stuff and all that. Wouldnt there be an arguement to say that since while under the agreement WOTC gave the permission for CMP to CREATE (keyword here) datasets for their products during that time period. Now I ain't no lawyer thats for sure, but wouldn't that now change the IP of the Datasets to CMP's ownership? as they did create the format and distrubition system for all of it. So wouldn't technically CMP still be in control of stuff THAT CMP CREATED during that time period? Yeah they couldn't put in any errata since then but anything released before the license expired would be fair game for the CMP monkeys. I'm just going to use a car analogy so you all can follow my line of thinking. You buy a car. By virtue of buying the car you can do what you want with it, raise it lower it, change the front end so it looks completly different. Or even just let it sit. Ford or Chevy then decide they no longer want to do business with you. They can't stop you from selling that car you already own. By this logic I think CMP is in a very interesting position of not really being unable to tread water. Cause technically they still own the rights for that time period. Just cause they can't create new stuff doesn't mean they can't sell their old datasets. These datasets were created long before the rug was pulled out. Thereby they are CMP datasets, cause there is no way WOTC gave them the data in that format. Maybe LoneJedi can answer that part on how they got data. So unless the data came over in that format, then the IP is now CMP's not WOTC. Now this is just a simple layman's take on it. But if I was on a jury I think I would be leaning on the CMP side if argued like this. Yeti They can't take back the [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
CMP: On its way out?
Top