Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Col_Pladoh? Original Kobolds, canine or lizard-like?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mythusmage" data-source="post: 17091" data-attributes="member: 571"><p><strong>After Years of Research</strong></p><p></p><p>The result of genetic sequencing in the city of Greyhawk 2000 (now Greyhawk 2002) has shown that kobolds are actually highly evolved dicynodont therapsids. Kobold "creationists" have attacked the results. </p><p></p><p>The results are in the process of being verified, but should they hold up it would appear that the kobold will have to be moved from his position next to dragons and placed in among the reptile-like mammals. For now the consensus is that the kobold is more closely related to the human than he is to the lizard man.</p><p></p><p>There has been some controversy over the kobold's position as reptile or mammal, based in large part on the structure of their jaw hinge, and the shape and positioning of the ossicles of the inner ear. This parallels the similar controversy over the same structure in monotremes, which are classified as mammals. Some have pointed out the similarities between the two groups in that area, and have claimed that the kobold's jaw and inner ear is actually more advanced than that of the echidnas and the platypus. Because of that they have proposed that the kobold be named a mammal, while the monotremes be relegated to the rank of reptile.</p><p></p><p>The whole "scale" controversy, it turns out, was based on a single subject with a bad case of a kobold genetic disorder. In this disease the subject's skin will become heavily "cornified". That is, the skin will become rough and "scaly" in patches. Kobolds refer to it as, "dragon hide". A healthy kobold has soft, supple skin, appearing much like human skin. As with humans calluses are known to form on the soles of the feet and the palms of the hands in those who walk barefoot and/or engage in heavy labor. Unlike humans, kobold hair remains short and fine throughout their lives, and all over the body. No head or groin hair in other words. The presence of finger and toe claws marks another visible difference between the two species.</p><p></p><p>Subtle and gross skeletal differences firmly separate humans and kobolds. The latter having certain primitive features no longer possessed by the former, as well as derived skeletal features evolved by the latter since the two lines diverged sometime in the late Triassic.</p><p></p><p>As you can see the "kobold matter" is at once simpler, and more complicated than the layman is aware of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mythusmage, post: 17091, member: 571"] [b]After Years of Research[/b] The result of genetic sequencing in the city of Greyhawk 2000 (now Greyhawk 2002) has shown that kobolds are actually highly evolved dicynodont therapsids. Kobold "creationists" have attacked the results. The results are in the process of being verified, but should they hold up it would appear that the kobold will have to be moved from his position next to dragons and placed in among the reptile-like mammals. For now the consensus is that the kobold is more closely related to the human than he is to the lizard man. There has been some controversy over the kobold's position as reptile or mammal, based in large part on the structure of their jaw hinge, and the shape and positioning of the ossicles of the inner ear. This parallels the similar controversy over the same structure in monotremes, which are classified as mammals. Some have pointed out the similarities between the two groups in that area, and have claimed that the kobold's jaw and inner ear is actually more advanced than that of the echidnas and the platypus. Because of that they have proposed that the kobold be named a mammal, while the monotremes be relegated to the rank of reptile. The whole "scale" controversy, it turns out, was based on a single subject with a bad case of a kobold genetic disorder. In this disease the subject's skin will become heavily "cornified". That is, the skin will become rough and "scaly" in patches. Kobolds refer to it as, "dragon hide". A healthy kobold has soft, supple skin, appearing much like human skin. As with humans calluses are known to form on the soles of the feet and the palms of the hands in those who walk barefoot and/or engage in heavy labor. Unlike humans, kobold hair remains short and fine throughout their lives, and all over the body. No head or groin hair in other words. The presence of finger and toe claws marks another visible difference between the two species. Subtle and gross skeletal differences firmly separate humans and kobolds. The latter having certain primitive features no longer possessed by the former, as well as derived skeletal features evolved by the latter since the two lines diverged sometime in the late Triassic. As you can see the "kobold matter" is at once simpler, and more complicated than the layman is aware of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Col_Pladoh? Original Kobolds, canine or lizard-like?
Top