Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cold Iron Brilliant Energy Longsword?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gaiden" data-source="post: 2144911" data-attributes="member: 103"><p>Considering Brilliant Energy costs a virtual +4 to the enhancement of the weapon, it would be rather silly for benefit to wind up being a hindrance (in terms of no longer being able to overcome damage reduction).</p><p></p><p>It seems you would need to pick one of two alternatives: the brilliant energy enhances the blade in question such that you get all the benefits of the brilliant energy property while retaining any previous properties of the blade. Incidentally this would, strictly speaking, be the proper interpretation according the RAW. Because the above is not mutually exclusive and the RAW don't specifically write something to the contrary, there is no reason that a cold iron brilliant energy weapon would not function as cold iron. These logical contradictions everyone speaks of are rather ridiculous - we are talking about magic. Whose to say that upon making the blade light it doesn't somehow incorporate the mystical powers of cold iron that allow one to bypass the DR of a fiend? The camp against this interpretation is open-minded enough to accept magic but then close-minded to the idea that this application of magic must obey physics... Come on.</p><p></p><p>The alternative is to treat the brilliiant energy property as transforming the blade and not just enhancing it such that now the blade is light INSTEAD of whatever it was before. If you do this you have to follow this interpretation through to its conclusion, however. If you are treating the blade as made out of light, it would technically count as energy in the same way that searing light, the lantern archon's ray attack, sunbeam, etc. would count as energy - meaning DR was irrelevant. As light it would count as an non-descriptor type of energy so that no energy resistance would apply. This interpretation makes a brilliant energy weapon perhaps more powerful than it was before - or for a +4 virtual enhancement is perhaps exactly as powerful as it should be considering the rarity of armor and shields on high CR monsters. YMMV</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gaiden, post: 2144911, member: 103"] Considering Brilliant Energy costs a virtual +4 to the enhancement of the weapon, it would be rather silly for benefit to wind up being a hindrance (in terms of no longer being able to overcome damage reduction). It seems you would need to pick one of two alternatives: the brilliant energy enhances the blade in question such that you get all the benefits of the brilliant energy property while retaining any previous properties of the blade. Incidentally this would, strictly speaking, be the proper interpretation according the RAW. Because the above is not mutually exclusive and the RAW don't specifically write something to the contrary, there is no reason that a cold iron brilliant energy weapon would not function as cold iron. These logical contradictions everyone speaks of are rather ridiculous - we are talking about magic. Whose to say that upon making the blade light it doesn't somehow incorporate the mystical powers of cold iron that allow one to bypass the DR of a fiend? The camp against this interpretation is open-minded enough to accept magic but then close-minded to the idea that this application of magic must obey physics... Come on. The alternative is to treat the brilliiant energy property as transforming the blade and not just enhancing it such that now the blade is light INSTEAD of whatever it was before. If you do this you have to follow this interpretation through to its conclusion, however. If you are treating the blade as made out of light, it would technically count as energy in the same way that searing light, the lantern archon's ray attack, sunbeam, etc. would count as energy - meaning DR was irrelevant. As light it would count as an non-descriptor type of energy so that no energy resistance would apply. This interpretation makes a brilliant energy weapon perhaps more powerful than it was before - or for a +4 virtual enhancement is perhaps exactly as powerful as it should be considering the rarity of armor and shields on high CR monsters. YMMV [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cold Iron Brilliant Energy Longsword?
Top