Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Color spray (or, for the Brits, colour spray)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Primitive Screwhead" data-source="post: 3420350" data-attributes="member: 20805"><p>Hm,... so maybe combining this aweful mess of a rule with another aweful mess of a rule you can get:</p><p></p><p> As a free action a character may choose to ignore enemies in a direction. They are considered blind to attacks from this sector. {the in-famous 'can I ignore a fighter to negate a rogues sneak attack' rule..sorry, don't have a link handy to those threads...}</p><p></p><p> The freindly fighter could then declare he was 'turning his back' on the mage, becoming effectively blinded and sightless for the purposes of that 90 degree arc...and thereby immune to the color spray. He could also not respond to anything occuring behind him that relies on sight and would not benefit from Dex if some bad guy happened to be able to attack him from that direction.</p><p></p><p> However, the fighter could also be providing soft cover to the mage's real targets and granting them a bonus to thier saves.</p><p></p><p></p><p> Since the act of ignoring someone has to be done on the fighters turn..and can't be undone until his/her next turn there has to be some level of communication. There is also the hazard of one of the BugBear Rogues rushing into the Fighters blindspot and SA'ing away...it should be obvious to the Bug Bears that the fighter is protecting his face from the Mage...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup, not having facing rules does cause some oddities here and there, but nothing to really get wrapped up in. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Primitive Screwhead, post: 3420350, member: 20805"] Hm,... so maybe combining this aweful mess of a rule with another aweful mess of a rule you can get: As a free action a character may choose to ignore enemies in a direction. They are considered blind to attacks from this sector. {the in-famous 'can I ignore a fighter to negate a rogues sneak attack' rule..sorry, don't have a link handy to those threads...} The freindly fighter could then declare he was 'turning his back' on the mage, becoming effectively blinded and sightless for the purposes of that 90 degree arc...and thereby immune to the color spray. He could also not respond to anything occuring behind him that relies on sight and would not benefit from Dex if some bad guy happened to be able to attack him from that direction. However, the fighter could also be providing soft cover to the mage's real targets and granting them a bonus to thier saves. Since the act of ignoring someone has to be done on the fighters turn..and can't be undone until his/her next turn there has to be some level of communication. There is also the hazard of one of the BugBear Rogues rushing into the Fighters blindspot and SA'ing away...it should be obvious to the Bug Bears that the fighter is protecting his face from the Mage... Yup, not having facing rules does cause some oddities here and there, but nothing to really get wrapped up in. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Color spray (or, for the Brits, colour spray)
Top