Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 8831361" data-attributes="member: 53980">The choice of polar opposites was intentional, as that allows for a scale, as opposed to strategic and tactical which are more of a Venn diagram.Strategy and tactics can exist at any table to various degrees.Whereas symmetric and asymmetric are trying to convey two distinct approaches. They might both be used at a table over the course of a campaign, but never at the same time. And some groups might strongly prefer one approach over the other.Strategy and tactics can both exist in either symmetric or asymmetric gameplay, so it doesn't convey the same distinction of a preference for a certain play style.</blockquote>