Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Combat Challenge question and the twfighter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="grolch" data-source="post: 4288103" data-attributes="member: 68951"><p>I've tried to read all I could find on the subject and I have doubts about what would be the official standpoint. apparantly gleemax hates me, so I thought I would try here.</p><p>First of all specific beats general is a bit vague when what is specific and what is general isn´t always totally clear. The wording of Combat Challenge is pretty vague or more to the point I don't get why the last two sentences isn't changed to "grants a opportunity attack" as the rules content of the two (immediate interupt with a melee basic attack) is exactly the same.</p><p>Going to the specific beats general my ruling would be that in this case Combat challenge is two parts, an automatic effect (marking) and a specific beats general issue, the attack. I see it as an opportunity attack (p. 290) with two new specific triggers adding to the general rule of opportunity attacks. Attacking anything not including the fighter and shifting. I just find it plain weird that the main defender trademark can't take advantage of Combat Superiority and all the heavy blade feats, especially after seeing a preveiw earlier stating that sword and board would be the go-to defender build. </p><p> (The excerpt article about weapons)</p><p></p><p>So my question, would you rule that the attack from Combat Challenge is an Opportunity attack?</p><p>Same line of thinking can be brought into the rogues Riposte Strike, again we have an ability that effectively gives an extra trigger to the opportunity attack rule. Without using the wording Opportunity.</p><p></p><p>And now to the optimazation part of this post, and maybe why these two aren't called opportunity attacks from a balance point of view. </p><p></p><p>I present: the two-weapon paragon fighter with epic awesomeness to boot or why rangers would suck:</p><p>fighter class</p><p>get 16 str and 16 dex and around 14-16 wis (elf or human is good)</p><p>buy a short sword and a longsword</p><p>Do the full rogue multiclass line, on lvl 11 go for Fighter Rogue Paragon, on lvl 11 choose Riposte Strike and all the blade feats and two-weapon feats you can get your hands on (blade opportunist/twf/twd, maybe paragon feats heavy-blade opportunist, light blade precision).</p><p> Use Riposte strike as your standard move, marking it up. now watch while the monster can do nothing but stand and glare without getting whacked over the head with a str+wis+6 (prof/weapon talent/blade opportunist) and be prevented from moving, now get to lvl 21 and get two weapon flurry (p. 207) and cry with laughter.</p><p></p><p>In general i find that the two powers should grant oppotunity attacks to take advantage of the feats, but Combat Challenge should be rephrased to only activate on fighter powers for balance (to avoid for example the build above, but also the lvl dragonborn breath marking I've seen mentioned elsewhere)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="grolch, post: 4288103, member: 68951"] I've tried to read all I could find on the subject and I have doubts about what would be the official standpoint. apparantly gleemax hates me, so I thought I would try here. First of all specific beats general is a bit vague when what is specific and what is general isn´t always totally clear. The wording of Combat Challenge is pretty vague or more to the point I don't get why the last two sentences isn't changed to "grants a opportunity attack" as the rules content of the two (immediate interupt with a melee basic attack) is exactly the same. Going to the specific beats general my ruling would be that in this case Combat challenge is two parts, an automatic effect (marking) and a specific beats general issue, the attack. I see it as an opportunity attack (p. 290) with two new specific triggers adding to the general rule of opportunity attacks. Attacking anything not including the fighter and shifting. I just find it plain weird that the main defender trademark can't take advantage of Combat Superiority and all the heavy blade feats, especially after seeing a preveiw earlier stating that sword and board would be the go-to defender build. (The excerpt article about weapons) So my question, would you rule that the attack from Combat Challenge is an Opportunity attack? Same line of thinking can be brought into the rogues Riposte Strike, again we have an ability that effectively gives an extra trigger to the opportunity attack rule. Without using the wording Opportunity. And now to the optimazation part of this post, and maybe why these two aren't called opportunity attacks from a balance point of view. I present: the two-weapon paragon fighter with epic awesomeness to boot or why rangers would suck: fighter class get 16 str and 16 dex and around 14-16 wis (elf or human is good) buy a short sword and a longsword Do the full rogue multiclass line, on lvl 11 go for Fighter Rogue Paragon, on lvl 11 choose Riposte Strike and all the blade feats and two-weapon feats you can get your hands on (blade opportunist/twf/twd, maybe paragon feats heavy-blade opportunist, light blade precision). Use Riposte strike as your standard move, marking it up. now watch while the monster can do nothing but stand and glare without getting whacked over the head with a str+wis+6 (prof/weapon talent/blade opportunist) and be prevented from moving, now get to lvl 21 and get two weapon flurry (p. 207) and cry with laughter. In general i find that the two powers should grant oppotunity attacks to take advantage of the feats, but Combat Challenge should be rephrased to only activate on fighter powers for balance (to avoid for example the build above, but also the lvl dragonborn breath marking I've seen mentioned elsewhere) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Combat Challenge question and the twfighter
Top