Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mentat55" data-source="post: 5178661" data-attributes="member: 14840">Towards the end of 3.5e, I started to realize something with fighters, which remains quite applicable in Pathfinder -- that while intense feat specialization leads to extremely potent, one-trick pony characters, a fighter with flexibility is more fun to play (for me).What that means is -- have a few different feats or feat trees going.  Power Attack for when an opponent has DR, low AC, or is vulnerable for a round (prone, stunned, etc).  Combat Expertise when you need to go toe-to-toe with a really tough monster.  Mobility to soak attacks of opportunity for the rest of your party, and Spring Attack to avoid them, and to keep a monster with lots of attacks from making a full attack action.  Disarm against weapon users, Step Up against melee spellcasters.I've started to build fighters more in that vein, and found they remain interesting for many levels.As for classes like barbarians and rogues, the introduction of rage powers and rogue talents is intended to add power, versatility, and options other than "rage" or "flank and sneak attack".</blockquote>