Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Combat length
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ariosto" data-source="post: 5118931" data-attributes="member: 80487"><p>I'm looking at this with a lack of 4e expertise relative to those who have played it a lot. At first glance, that strikes me as very strange. Especially with 4e's basically reciprocal "easier to hit you = harder to get hit by you" setup, that seems like a pretty notable advantage.</p><p></p><p>(1) If the PCs are going to lose, then I would expect that to be clear and resolved -- whether by surrender, withdrawal or slaughter -- sooner rather than later. Is not greater likelihood of defeat normally reflected in greater rapidity, e.g., in HP loss?</p><p></p><p>(2) If the PCs win, then that is not likely to have been a product of giving unfavorable odds <em>more</em> time to assert themselves! 4e, like casinos, is designed on that principle. A win against the odds is much more likely to be a result either of (A) a lucky fluke of chance; or (B) a stratagem that changes the odds dramatically, perhaps more than temporarily due to cascading effects. In either case, a finish if not sooner, then at least not so much later, than in the case of an even match seems to me expected.</p><p></p><p>Based on that, I suspect that the problem is that your high-level monsters did not in fact so shift the odds. In that case, the outcome (maybe even the cost in resources) is probably not much more in doubt than if the fighting power were made up of lower-level foes.</p><p></p><p>However, the multiplying double whammy of having more HP <em>and</em> better defenses makes the high-level monster take longer to wear down. The excitement factor is probably less than if players were able to mark progress by felling foe after foe. I guess it might add interest if the damage the monster dishes out were enough more to put individual characters significantly more at risk -- but that seems to me not the way 4e tends to go.</p><p></p><p>So, maybe a "higher level monster" is really worthwhile mainly when the total challenge is remarkable -- either when PCs "ought to" lose a fight (if they ill-advisedly <em>start</em> one), or when there is some cunning way for players to tilt the odds at least back to even.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ariosto, post: 5118931, member: 80487"] I'm looking at this with a lack of 4e expertise relative to those who have played it a lot. At first glance, that strikes me as very strange. Especially with 4e's basically reciprocal "easier to hit you = harder to get hit by you" setup, that seems like a pretty notable advantage. (1) If the PCs are going to lose, then I would expect that to be clear and resolved -- whether by surrender, withdrawal or slaughter -- sooner rather than later. Is not greater likelihood of defeat normally reflected in greater rapidity, e.g., in HP loss? (2) If the PCs win, then that is not likely to have been a product of giving unfavorable odds [I]more[/I] time to assert themselves! 4e, like casinos, is designed on that principle. A win against the odds is much more likely to be a result either of (A) a lucky fluke of chance; or (B) a stratagem that changes the odds dramatically, perhaps more than temporarily due to cascading effects. In either case, a finish if not sooner, then at least not so much later, than in the case of an even match seems to me expected. Based on that, I suspect that the problem is that your high-level monsters did not in fact so shift the odds. In that case, the outcome (maybe even the cost in resources) is probably not much more in doubt than if the fighting power were made up of lower-level foes. However, the multiplying double whammy of having more HP [I]and[/I] better defenses makes the high-level monster take longer to wear down. The excitement factor is probably less than if players were able to mark progress by felling foe after foe. I guess it might add interest if the damage the monster dishes out were enough more to put individual characters significantly more at risk -- but that seems to me not the way 4e tends to go. So, maybe a "higher level monster" is really worthwhile mainly when the total challenge is remarkable -- either when PCs "ought to" lose a fight (if they ill-advisedly [i]start[/i] one), or when there is some cunning way for players to tilt the odds at least back to even. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Combat length
Top