Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Piratecat" data-source="post: 3352296" data-attributes="member: 2">Bwah ha ha! I've actually suspended more people this month than I have in the preceding four combined, and every one of them was a regular poster. One had over 3000 posts. So I'm not exactly sure where that complaint comes from; you're welcome to email me about it if you want to satisfy my curiosity. In fact, complaints about moderators should always be handled by email and not in the forums, please. But what you're seeing here is people objecting to the unilateral statements "no, allowing AoOs on 5' steps is broken, no matter which way you slice it. no character should be allowed that." and "also, that entire book is broken, and a waste of money." You may not realize it, but what you're saying in those sentences is "This is the truth and anyone who disagrees with me is wrong." If you had phrased them as less of an absolute, I suspect that the reception would have been much less sarcastic.There's nothing wrong with holding strong opinions. When you force them on other people as 'Teh troof!', however - "the beguiler is broken, no two ways about it" - arguments tend to blossom. Please avoid that particular style of arguing. I think you'll find the discussions a lot more interesting and hospitable when you do.And... back on subject, please. Anyone who wants to discuss this further should drop me a line.</blockquote>