Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Combat styles and multi-classing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7626531" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>It's triply frustrating when I make a point and the connection should be obvious but you act like it isn't.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>LOL why would you think that? Depending on the character's concept the +1 to AC could easily be taken first before the bonus to damage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My dwarf did.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> Oh, so that is why you think that since you rate the bonus to AC so lowly...</p><p></p><p>Well, that is fine for your opinion, but no, I disagree. Most of the features you discuss are limited in uses. I much prefer a feature that is constant. Considering the number of attacks against the dwarf I had, that +1 to AC was very useful--all the time. Sure, he could action surge a couple times a day and I am not saying those sort of features don't have their uses (especially in novas), but I would put them on par with the fighting styles or at least equivalent relative to the level the features are obtained.</p><p></p><p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left">It would. Look at the analysis people have already done! If you take away a second fighting style, that only limits the attractiveness of mulitclassing. And you are making very broad general assumptions about how other people play their games. Our table values fighting styles and would like to see even more done with them, but if you limited multiclasses to a single style, what would be the point? (that is rhetorical, in case you missed it...)</p> <p style="text-align: left"></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7626531, member: 6987520"] It's triply frustrating when I make a point and the connection should be obvious but you act like it isn't. LOL why would you think that? Depending on the character's concept the +1 to AC could easily be taken first before the bonus to damage. My dwarf did. Oh, so that is why you think that since you rate the bonus to AC so lowly... Well, that is fine for your opinion, but no, I disagree. Most of the features you discuss are limited in uses. I much prefer a feature that is constant. Considering the number of attacks against the dwarf I had, that +1 to AC was very useful--all the time. Sure, he could action surge a couple times a day and I am not saying those sort of features don't have their uses (especially in novas), but I would put them on par with the fighting styles or at least equivalent relative to the level the features are obtained. [LEFT] It would. Look at the analysis people have already done! If you take away a second fighting style, that only limits the attractiveness of mulitclassing. And you are making very broad general assumptions about how other people play their games. Our table values fighting styles and would like to see even more done with them, but if you limited multiclasses to a single style, what would be the point? (that is rhetorical, in case you missed it...) [/LEFT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Combat styles and multi-classing
Top