Are there any specific rules for pricing the combined the effects of various wonderous items? Ex. A robe of the Archmage with a pocket that acts like a Type I bag of Holding.
Now, you can say
"Ok, you have them both, just add them together for 77,500 gp"
OR "Dude, that item is more powerful than both items individually, because they're -together-, meaning they take up less slots! Give me 80,000 gp"
OR "Dude, that item is as powerful as both items, but since they're -together-you're more vulnerable. All your eggs in one basket and whatnot. Give me 77,000 gp"
I think all three arguments make sense, but each case is a litte different. If both (or all three, four, and so on) items are slotless, then the second argument doesn't really have any sway. If only ONE of the items fills a slot, then it still doesn't. However, if even just two fill different slots, or the same slot, then that's pretty big. Also, in cases like this example, the third argument will work best if they're all slotless, but the actual discount will differ greatly depending on the item's price relationships to each other. For instance, if the Bag of Holding in the robe was Type IV instead of I, I would think maybe 83,000 gp might work, as now giving a 2,000 gp discount won't drop the price of the addition to virtually zero. But I would only discount this much because the robe itself cost so many times that of the Bag of Holding.
Thoughts? Yes, "Just ad hoc it" is probably the best answer
Eltern
Now, you can say
"Ok, you have them both, just add them together for 77,500 gp"
OR "Dude, that item is more powerful than both items individually, because they're -together-, meaning they take up less slots! Give me 80,000 gp"
OR "Dude, that item is as powerful as both items, but since they're -together-you're more vulnerable. All your eggs in one basket and whatnot. Give me 77,000 gp"
I think all three arguments make sense, but each case is a litte different. If both (or all three, four, and so on) items are slotless, then the second argument doesn't really have any sway. If only ONE of the items fills a slot, then it still doesn't. However, if even just two fill different slots, or the same slot, then that's pretty big. Also, in cases like this example, the third argument will work best if they're all slotless, but the actual discount will differ greatly depending on the item's price relationships to each other. For instance, if the Bag of Holding in the robe was Type IV instead of I, I would think maybe 83,000 gp might work, as now giving a 2,000 gp discount won't drop the price of the addition to virtually zero. But I would only discount this much because the robe itself cost so many times that of the Bag of Holding.
Thoughts? Yes, "Just ad hoc it" is probably the best answer

Eltern