Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7298404" data-attributes="member: 12731">I still think anyone advocating a "Nystul approach" needs to explain WHY they're suggesting their new spell.Is is because... 1. They like the way d20 casters could dominate battlefields and buff everyone to demigod statistics? If so, great, please proceed.2. Spells like Nystuls this or Simbuls that existed in d20, so why not in 5e? Because it's a different game and adding in this kind of capability breaks the game.3. Because they want to explore balanced ways to nudge the limits on concentration in 5e.Only for 3. am I aboard, and the way to do it is to drop the generic combo idea - that's never gonna be balanced (or horribly underpowered for every combo but the strongest).Instead the solution must be to handcraft individual combos. Or, if that's too restrictive, try to curate the spells available for combination to keep down the risk of power abuse.Myself, I suggest spells with red ratings.Sent from my C6603 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></blockquote>