Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LesserThan" data-source="post: 9312556" data-attributes="member: 7045327">Not going to cut this one up, because I need to read it all while replying. Going backwards...No, I can not understand the self harm in wanting to be something that exemplifies someones problems in real life. As I said to Chalequin, the &quot;sanitizing&quot; sort of defeats the purpose. If you want empathy with something being persecuted, why remove the persecution? You lose the whole point of playing a relative thing. So do not play a sanitized teifling at that point?&quot;Why not?&quot;, because Colin seems like one of those people willing to lie to your face just to get your money. A true politician. I think the first video was made only because it was some sort of goal reached for a Kickstarter type thing. So he only offered to apologize if he got enough money. He is a charlatan. Charlatans should not be trusted.He could have easily said, as you stated, &quot;I was only 22&quot;, then followed with T$R being anti playtesting, crunch time heavy, just shove anything out the door to grab as much money as you can and to Hell with quality.Colin should apply at WotC.I would not care either way about the &quot;balance&quot; as that was never a thing before WotC. I think it is called Rule of Cool niw? We just called it throwing it at the wall and seeing what sticks. Use what you like, do not use what you don't. There was no need for an apology, because any DM using anything &quot;broken&quot; in their game is at fault, not some random author that just sold you their own imagination.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LesserThan, post: 9312556, member: 7045327"] Not going to cut this one up, because I need to read it all while replying. Going backwards... No, I can not understand the self harm in wanting to be something that exemplifies someones problems in real life. As I said to Chalequin, the "sanitizing" sort of defeats the purpose. If you want empathy with something being persecuted, why remove the persecution? You lose the whole point of playing a relative thing. So do not play a sanitized teifling at that point? "Why not?", because Colin seems like one of those people willing to lie to your face just to get your money. A true politician. I think the first video was made only because it was some sort of goal reached for a Kickstarter type thing. So he only offered to apologize if he got enough money. He is a charlatan. Charlatans should not be trusted. He could have easily said, as you stated, "I was only 22", then followed with T$R being anti playtesting, crunch time heavy, just shove anything out the door to grab as much money as you can and to Hell with quality. Colin should apply at WotC. I would not care either way about the "balance" as that was never a thing before WotC. I think it is called Rule of Cool niw? We just called it throwing it at the wall and seeing what sticks. Use what you like, do not use what you don't. There was no need for an apology, because any DM using anything "broken" in their game is at fault, not some random author that just sold you their own imagination. [/QUOTE]

Verification