Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9315388" data-attributes="member: 6790260">RE: the original thread topicSaw a video recently that pointed out that, when you look up most races in D&D, male characters are depicted with practical clothes or full armor, while women are almost always depicted scantily clad for whatever they're doing--even professional dwarf smiths have major boob window going on.But what I was surprsied (and somewhat pleased) to see is...this is at least less true of "male dragonborn" vs "female dragonborn" when I look them up in a browser I rarely use (Edge, in this case) so as to avoid targeted image searches. There were several scantily-clad male pictures in just the first dozen or so, while several of the female pictures were in full practical clothing or outright fully armored (and that's excluding the official art, which usually avoids boob window and the like.)Though I did notice that, despite WotC's new(-ish...) stance regarding female dragonborn endowment, most art of female dragonborn still gives them breasts--regardless of the artist or player (many of whom were, in fact, women themselves.)</blockquote>