Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ruvion" data-source="post: 224304" data-attributes="member: 878">A good looking dwarf lady?&nbsp; I, as a human, don't find a girl with beard any more attractive than the dwarf beside her (no offense to dwarves).&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Supermodels are wide considered appealing all over the globes nowadays true, but back several centuries they would not be considered the height of fashion...many beautiful women back then were plump by our current standards.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />P.S. I personally do not find Marilyn Monroe beautiful.&nbsp; Pretty yes, mysterious looking maybe, but not my idea of the apex of female beauty IMO.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ruvion, post: 224304, member: 878"] A good looking dwarf lady? I, as a human, don't find a girl with beard any more attractive than the dwarf beside her (no offense to dwarves). ;) Supermodels are wide considered appealing all over the globes nowadays true, but back several centuries they would not be considered the height of fashion...many beautiful women back then were plump by our current standards. :D P.S. I personally do not find Marilyn Monroe beautiful. Pretty yes, mysterious looking maybe, but not my idea of the apex of female beauty IMO. [/QUOTE]

Verification