Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Comment on the negative article by John Dodd
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6348476" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>It's a weak criticism because it only focuses on one of the few elements the D&D Starter Set where has an edge on the Pathfinder Beginner Box: price. </p><p>The D&D box could have had a similar layout and ease of accessibility. It could have cross referenced between the rulebook and the character sheets. The D&D Starter Set could have been more than the Basic Rules edited down for size and paired with an adventure. </p><p>All of that could have been done and kept the same price point. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I could go on and on about the price. I could point out that the average 14yo should have an allowance in the $7-14 range, so they can purchase a $20 product in two weeks. Something that you don't save up to purchase, something that is not anticipated, is less valued. Or how $20 is low for a gift product. Meaning it will either be paired with another product of equal so-so value making the set fight for attention, or ignored for a more substantial gift. </p><p>But this is all irrelevant because the price is irrelevant in regards to the actual quality of the product. Value, yes. Desirability, yes. But quality... if the desire is there to really make the product amazing, to make a product stand out as much as the Pathfinder Beginner Box then there was nothing stopping WotC.</p><p></p><p>Just look at what the PF Beginner Box looks like:</p><p>[ATTACH]63227[/ATTACH][ATTACH]63228[/ATTACH][ATTACH]63229[/ATTACH]</p><p>(from the free expansion material on Paizo's website.)</p><p>It's bright and vibrant and clean and so very accessible. They spent so much time tweaking the format of options than they decided to change the presentation of magic items in the main product line. </p><p>The Starter Set is solid but it's got some pretty giant walls of text. And most of the rules is right out of Basic unmodified.</p><p></p><p>I'm not going to say they phoned it in. Some work was put into the adventure (by freelancer Rich Baker). And making the rules easy (by the design team). But neither did they go above and beyond. They didn't try and make the best Starter Set ever, to reinvent and improve the starter set experience. They just set out to make a better Starter Set than the last Starter Set. Which would have been fine had Paizo not done something very different a few years earlier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6348476, member: 37579"] It's a weak criticism because it only focuses on one of the few elements the D&D Starter Set where has an edge on the Pathfinder Beginner Box: price. The D&D box could have had a similar layout and ease of accessibility. It could have cross referenced between the rulebook and the character sheets. The D&D Starter Set could have been more than the Basic Rules edited down for size and paired with an adventure. All of that could have been done and kept the same price point. I could go on and on about the price. I could point out that the average 14yo should have an allowance in the $7-14 range, so they can purchase a $20 product in two weeks. Something that you don't save up to purchase, something that is not anticipated, is less valued. Or how $20 is low for a gift product. Meaning it will either be paired with another product of equal so-so value making the set fight for attention, or ignored for a more substantial gift. But this is all irrelevant because the price is irrelevant in regards to the actual quality of the product. Value, yes. Desirability, yes. But quality... if the desire is there to really make the product amazing, to make a product stand out as much as the Pathfinder Beginner Box then there was nothing stopping WotC. Just look at what the PF Beginner Box looks like: [ATTACH=CONFIG]63227._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]63228._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]63229._xfImport[/ATTACH] (from the free expansion material on Paizo's website.) It's bright and vibrant and clean and so very accessible. They spent so much time tweaking the format of options than they decided to change the presentation of magic items in the main product line. The Starter Set is solid but it's got some pretty giant walls of text. And most of the rules is right out of Basic unmodified. I'm not going to say they phoned it in. Some work was put into the adventure (by freelancer Rich Baker). And making the rules easy (by the design team). But neither did they go above and beyond. They didn't try and make the best Starter Set ever, to reinvent and improve the starter set experience. They just set out to make a better Starter Set than the last Starter Set. Which would have been fine had Paizo not done something very different a few years earlier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Comment on the negative article by John Dodd
Top