Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Comment on the negative article by John Dodd
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6348784" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>Yes, because I said it's one of the most important factors. And I asked you a question that explains why it is so important, but you didn't answer. I will ask again - is there a price at which you would buy the D&D set but not the PF set? If the PF set were $100 and the D&D set were $20, would that do it? What's the line you draw (if it's not cheap vs pricey, which we already established)?</p><p></p><p>When you find that line, you will understand my point. For me, I've already hit that line. The PF set priced me out of the market, so it doesn't matter what is in it. I don't in general need a starter set - the only way I am an audience for one is if I consider it a good set AND it's priced right. The D&D set is a good set (regardless of how it compares to another set out there - it's good on its own) and it's at the right price. The analysis for me on the PF stops at the price. I don't even get to whether it is good or not at that point.</p><p></p><p>I actually ended up buying TWO D&D starter sets. One to give away right away to a new player, and another to run the adventure before I give it away to a new player. I can do that at $12 each. I can never do that for the PF set - I cannot even buy one of them for the price of these two sets I bought from Amazon. Price is that important a factor.</p><p></p><p>BTW I hate those images you posted of the PF starter set. What you like, with vibrant colors, I despise. It looks childish, it looks garish, it looks cartoonish, it looks altogether soul-less to me. I wish you hadn't ever shown me those pictures because now I know for sure that set is never for me. It would be fine for a superhero game, but for D&D? Wow, no way. From my subjective view, that is just awful. It looks like some of the worst aspects of 4e - stuff they started to finally move away from in their later books when they realized how it was coming across to many. Totally removes the sense of magic and mystery that is such a good part of D&D. Ugh, and that Barbarian Manga-looking character? What do you see in that, it's ridiculous looking!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6348784, member: 2525"] Yes, because I said it's one of the most important factors. And I asked you a question that explains why it is so important, but you didn't answer. I will ask again - is there a price at which you would buy the D&D set but not the PF set? If the PF set were $100 and the D&D set were $20, would that do it? What's the line you draw (if it's not cheap vs pricey, which we already established)? When you find that line, you will understand my point. For me, I've already hit that line. The PF set priced me out of the market, so it doesn't matter what is in it. I don't in general need a starter set - the only way I am an audience for one is if I consider it a good set AND it's priced right. The D&D set is a good set (regardless of how it compares to another set out there - it's good on its own) and it's at the right price. The analysis for me on the PF stops at the price. I don't even get to whether it is good or not at that point. I actually ended up buying TWO D&D starter sets. One to give away right away to a new player, and another to run the adventure before I give it away to a new player. I can do that at $12 each. I can never do that for the PF set - I cannot even buy one of them for the price of these two sets I bought from Amazon. Price is that important a factor. BTW I hate those images you posted of the PF starter set. What you like, with vibrant colors, I despise. It looks childish, it looks garish, it looks cartoonish, it looks altogether soul-less to me. I wish you hadn't ever shown me those pictures because now I know for sure that set is never for me. It would be fine for a superhero game, but for D&D? Wow, no way. From my subjective view, that is just awful. It looks like some of the worst aspects of 4e - stuff they started to finally move away from in their later books when they realized how it was coming across to many. Totally removes the sense of magic and mystery that is such a good part of D&D. Ugh, and that Barbarian Manga-looking character? What do you see in that, it's ridiculous looking! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Comment on the negative article by John Dodd
Top