Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Common sense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 2589023" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>I think RAW vs common sense is a false dichotomy. Many things in the RAW go against common sense, but are accepted for the sake of simplicity. Is there a chance that you will hit your friend when you fire a ranged weapon past him to hit the opponent he is fighting in melee? Common sense says yes, but the RAW says that your friend provides the opponent with a +4 cover bonus to AC and you just take a -4 penalty for firing into melee. It isn't as realistic, but it requires less dice rolls and keeps the game going more smoothly.</p><p></p><p>"Common sense" is also a somewhat loaded term, in the sense that most people think they possess it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Unfortunately, most of the time, "common sense" is just shorthand for "this looks logical to me" or "this is my preference" or "this is my opinion", and all these things can be heavily influenced by our background and experiences. As a very simple example, I watched many Chinese <em>wuxia</em> television shows as a child, and so I find nothing strange about the idea of highly skilled individuals being able to fly around, blast energy beams from their hands, and wield strange weapons that decapitate their opponents at a distance. It has probably also influenced my tolerance for high-powered, fantastic settings and games. Someone else whose main fantasy influence is the books about Conan the Barbarian might have a very different idea of what is logical, possible and preferable.</p><p></p><p>So instead of saying, "This is common sense," try using, "This seems more in line with the games I like to play," or "This is more likely to create the effect, mood, atmosphere or style of play that I want."</p><p></p><p>Instead of going strictly by the RAW or by common sense, I prefer to go on the basis of what seems like it's going to be more fun (and this usually means more balanced) for myself and my players. Maybe that's a special application of common sense, but I'd prefer not to call it that. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>EDIT: Mis-spelled Conan the Barbarain. Please don't attack me, or I'll be forced to use my Five Point Exploding Palm Technique.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 2589023, member: 3424"] I think RAW vs common sense is a false dichotomy. Many things in the RAW go against common sense, but are accepted for the sake of simplicity. Is there a chance that you will hit your friend when you fire a ranged weapon past him to hit the opponent he is fighting in melee? Common sense says yes, but the RAW says that your friend provides the opponent with a +4 cover bonus to AC and you just take a -4 penalty for firing into melee. It isn't as realistic, but it requires less dice rolls and keeps the game going more smoothly. "Common sense" is also a somewhat loaded term, in the sense that most people think they possess it. ;) Unfortunately, most of the time, "common sense" is just shorthand for "this looks logical to me" or "this is my preference" or "this is my opinion", and all these things can be heavily influenced by our background and experiences. As a very simple example, I watched many Chinese [I]wuxia[/I] television shows as a child, and so I find nothing strange about the idea of highly skilled individuals being able to fly around, blast energy beams from their hands, and wield strange weapons that decapitate their opponents at a distance. It has probably also influenced my tolerance for high-powered, fantastic settings and games. Someone else whose main fantasy influence is the books about Conan the Barbarian might have a very different idea of what is logical, possible and preferable. So instead of saying, "This is common sense," try using, "This seems more in line with the games I like to play," or "This is more likely to create the effect, mood, atmosphere or style of play that I want." Instead of going strictly by the RAW or by common sense, I prefer to go on the basis of what seems like it's going to be more fun (and this usually means more balanced) for myself and my players. Maybe that's a special application of common sense, but I'd prefer not to call it that. :p EDIT: Mis-spelled Conan the Barbarain. Please don't attack me, or I'll be forced to use my Five Point Exploding Palm Technique. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Common sense
Top