Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Companion thread to 5E Survivor - Subclasses (Part IX: Paladin)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8801875" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>It doesn't really seem that way from its description. "The Oath of Devotion binds a paladin to the loftiest ideals of justice, virtue, and order. Sometimes called cavaliers, white knights, or holy warriors, these paladins meet the ideal of the knight in shining armor, acting with honor in pursuit of justice and the greater good. They hold themselves to the highest standards of conduct, and some, for better or worse, hold the rest of the world to the same standards." The only way this is different from devotion-in-the-generic is the requirement of goodness. Remove the requirement of <em>goodness</em> and it literally is just "be devoted to something." In fact, in pure mechanical terms, <em>nothing</em> about the Oath of Devotion requires you to be good. You could very easily be an <em>evil</em> Devotion Paladin--because it's <em>protection from evil <strong>and good</strong></em>, after all. And everyone knows Lucifer was an angel...</p><p></p><p>I'm not entirely sure what you mean by the parenthetical. Redemption is about helping <em>others</em> to achieve redemption, not about finding it yourself (though you totally could do that, it wouldn't <em>contradict</em> anything, it's just not what the oath is about.) The Redemption features are all about nonviolence, diplomacy, and incapacitation instead of killing--but even the example oath tenets explicitly say, "Any such action [read: passing lethal judgment on an evildoer] must be carefully weighed and the consequences fully understood, but once you have made the decision, follow through with it knowing your path is just."</p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean, sure? I'm not really challenging that. I'm just saying, this is blander than unflavored oatmeal. It is, in effect, "Paladin, just Good." Which almost all Paladins will be good regardless, so...yeah. I get that there is a <em>reason</em> such things <em>should</em> exist. But it's incredibly dull and boring. The only subclasses that are more boring than Devotion are Champion Fighter and Berserker Barbarian, and those died <em>right quick</em>.</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>But they're still about devotion</em>. That's my point. Devotion is the heart of what the Paladin class <em>is</em>. It doesn't matter that the Oath of Devotion entails goodness; <em>to be a Paladin</em> IS <em>to be devoted</em>. ALL Oaths are devotional. Every single one of them. Hence my statement about "cookie-flavored cookies." I wouldn't--at all--mind there being a...I dunno, "Oath of Righteousness," where it's about being an absolutely sterling example of moral rectitude for others, and sometimes encouraging (or bullying) others to follow that example. Beacuse <em>not all Paladins will be righteous</em>. But EVERY Paladin, absolutely all Paladins, will be <em>devoted</em>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I think it should be rewritten to actually reflect that it is about devotion <em>to righteousness</em>, not about devotion-in-general. Because all Paladins, by definition, are devoted to something. "devotion, n.: 1. profound dedication, especially to religion. 2. earnest attachment to a cause, person, etc." But profound dedication to the Bane, the Lord of War, or Erathis, the Law-Queen, means <em>quite</em> different things from being a Paladin with profound dedication to righteousness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8801875, member: 6790260"] It doesn't really seem that way from its description. "The Oath of Devotion binds a paladin to the loftiest ideals of justice, virtue, and order. Sometimes called cavaliers, white knights, or holy warriors, these paladins meet the ideal of the knight in shining armor, acting with honor in pursuit of justice and the greater good. They hold themselves to the highest standards of conduct, and some, for better or worse, hold the rest of the world to the same standards." The only way this is different from devotion-in-the-generic is the requirement of goodness. Remove the requirement of [I]goodness[/I] and it literally is just "be devoted to something." In fact, in pure mechanical terms, [I]nothing[/I] about the Oath of Devotion requires you to be good. You could very easily be an [I]evil[/I] Devotion Paladin--because it's [I]protection from evil [B]and good[/B][/I], after all. And everyone knows Lucifer was an angel... I'm not entirely sure what you mean by the parenthetical. Redemption is about helping [I]others[/I] to achieve redemption, not about finding it yourself (though you totally could do that, it wouldn't [I]contradict[/I] anything, it's just not what the oath is about.) The Redemption features are all about nonviolence, diplomacy, and incapacitation instead of killing--but even the example oath tenets explicitly say, "Any such action [read: passing lethal judgment on an evildoer] must be carefully weighed and the consequences fully understood, but once you have made the decision, follow through with it knowing your path is just." I mean, sure? I'm not really challenging that. I'm just saying, this is blander than unflavored oatmeal. It is, in effect, "Paladin, just Good." Which almost all Paladins will be good regardless, so...yeah. I get that there is a [I]reason[/I] such things [I]should[/I] exist. But it's incredibly dull and boring. The only subclasses that are more boring than Devotion are Champion Fighter and Berserker Barbarian, and those died [I]right quick[/I]. [I]But they're still about devotion[/I]. That's my point. Devotion is the heart of what the Paladin class [I]is[/I]. It doesn't matter that the Oath of Devotion entails goodness; [I]to be a Paladin[/I] IS [I]to be devoted[/I]. ALL Oaths are devotional. Every single one of them. Hence my statement about "cookie-flavored cookies." I wouldn't--at all--mind there being a...I dunno, "Oath of Righteousness," where it's about being an absolutely sterling example of moral rectitude for others, and sometimes encouraging (or bullying) others to follow that example. Beacuse [I]not all Paladins will be righteous[/I]. But EVERY Paladin, absolutely all Paladins, will be [I]devoted[/I]. Again, I think it should be rewritten to actually reflect that it is about devotion [I]to righteousness[/I], not about devotion-in-general. Because all Paladins, by definition, are devoted to something. "devotion, n.: 1. profound dedication, especially to religion. 2. earnest attachment to a cause, person, etc." But profound dedication to the Bane, the Lord of War, or Erathis, the Law-Queen, means [I]quite[/I] different things from being a Paladin with profound dedication to righteousness. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Companion thread to 5E Survivor - Subclasses (Part IX: Paladin)
Top