Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8854551" data-attributes="member: 6987520">You aren't telling me how that says more about me.First, I never said I &quot;can never remember to use them.&quot; I said &quot;I forget about them more often than not,&quot; as well as &quot;I just don't need them&quot;. You also seem to think that is &quot;mainly&quot; the reason, even though it was after not needing them. So, if you are going to read my posts and respond please make sure you read them all and don't read more into them than what I am writing. Thanks.If I play a subclass and don't feel I need to use its features or OFTEN forget they are even there, that means they aren't that good IMO. If they were good (to me) I would certainly use them. A lot of subclasses I play have features I use regularly, which means they are good to me.The concept of the Battle Master is decent enough. The execution is lacking. Players do complain that using and tracking the superiority die is too fiddly as well. They also complain most of the maneuvers really just add extra damage. Looking at its features you find very little that makes the subclass a &quot;Battle Master.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8854551, member: 6987520"] You aren't telling me [I]how[/I] that says more about [I]me[/I]. First, I never said I "can never remember to use them." I said "I forget about them [B][I]more often than not[/I][/B][I],[/I]" as well as "I just don't need them". You also seem to think that is "mainly" the reason, even though it was after not needing them. So, if you are going to read my posts and respond please make sure you read them all and don't read more into them than what I am writing. Thanks. If I play a subclass and don't feel I need to use its features or OFTEN forget they are even there, that means they aren't that good IMO. If they were good (to me) I would certainly use them. A lot of subclasses I play have features I use regularly, which means they are good to me. The concept of the Battle Master is decent enough. The execution is lacking. Players [I]do[/I] complain that using and tracking the superiority die is too fiddly as well. They also complain most of the maneuvers really just add extra damage. Looking at its features you find very little that makes the subclass a "Battle Master." [/QUOTE]

Verification