Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Complaining about 3.5 weapon size rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 1779778" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>Yes, it was possible, but I don't think it was often done. Not all DMs are experienced or confident enough to tinker with the rules. </p><p></p><p>Then there was that additional quirk of 3.0e that made the kukri a Tiny exotic weapon. So, if I invent a halfling rapier, which does the same amount of damage and has the same threat range as a kukri, but does piercing instead of slashing damage, would it be a martial or exotic weapon? Fortunately, the kukri was also re-classified as a martial weapon in 3.5e, which cleared up a lot of issues. </p><p></p><p>The new weapon rules do two things. One, by introducing the concept of sizing weapons to the user, it greatly increased the scope of weapon options for Small characters (without adding to the DM's work). Two, by introducing simple rules for scaling the weapon damage to size, it made it easier to introduce new weapons which could be easily adapted to users of any size.</p><p></p><p>I don't think anybody would disagree with the above advantages. From what I've read, the main problems seem to be that the penalty for using weapons made for a different sized user fails to simulate the historical accuracy of <em>The Hobbit</em> and <em>The Lord of the Rings</em>, and that it is difficult to keep track of the difference between a Small scimitar and a Medium kukri. </p><p></p><p>For the former, I guess there is always the optional weapon equivalency rules, and for the latter, perhaps we can come up with a unique name for a weapon of each size so that a Small scimitar is a kukri, a Medium scimitar is a scimitar, a Large scimitar is a falchion, a Huge scimitar is a great scimitar, a Tiny scimitar is a light kukri, and since I'm out of ideas, you'll just have to come up with names for the Gargantuan scimitar, the Colossal scimitar, the Dimunitive scimitar and the Fine scimitar yourselves.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I forgot about the Colossal falchion and the Fine kukri. The 3.5e weapon size system must really be overloading what limited mental capacity I have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 1779778, member: 3424"] Yes, it was possible, but I don't think it was often done. Not all DMs are experienced or confident enough to tinker with the rules. Then there was that additional quirk of 3.0e that made the kukri a Tiny exotic weapon. So, if I invent a halfling rapier, which does the same amount of damage and has the same threat range as a kukri, but does piercing instead of slashing damage, would it be a martial or exotic weapon? Fortunately, the kukri was also re-classified as a martial weapon in 3.5e, which cleared up a lot of issues. The new weapon rules do two things. One, by introducing the concept of sizing weapons to the user, it greatly increased the scope of weapon options for Small characters (without adding to the DM's work). Two, by introducing simple rules for scaling the weapon damage to size, it made it easier to introduce new weapons which could be easily adapted to users of any size. I don't think anybody would disagree with the above advantages. From what I've read, the main problems seem to be that the penalty for using weapons made for a different sized user fails to simulate the historical accuracy of [I]The Hobbit[/I] and [I]The Lord of the Rings[/I], and that it is difficult to keep track of the difference between a Small scimitar and a Medium kukri. For the former, I guess there is always the optional weapon equivalency rules, and for the latter, perhaps we can come up with a unique name for a weapon of each size so that a Small scimitar is a kukri, a Medium scimitar is a scimitar, a Large scimitar is a falchion, a Huge scimitar is a great scimitar, a Tiny scimitar is a light kukri, and since I'm out of ideas, you'll just have to come up with names for the Gargantuan scimitar, the Colossal scimitar, the Dimunitive scimitar and the Fine scimitar yourselves. EDIT: I forgot about the Colossal falchion and the Fine kukri. The 3.5e weapon size system must really be overloading what limited mental capacity I have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Complaining about 3.5 weapon size rules
Top