Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Storyteller01" data-source="post: 1780984" data-attributes="member: 20931">My problem is (such as it is <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />) is that WotC wants me to pay $120 dollars or more (roughly $40 a book) for minor rules changes that had relegated as GM fiat for the last 25 years. If common sense can't answer this kind of problem, then come up with a nonsensical one. Don't sting your customs over little details. They could just as easily written &quot;The complete book of little guys and gals&quot; with this info printed in it.The previous system was good. It didn't cover every detail, so the GM and the players had room to do what they wanted. If you GM allowed a wizard to wield a Greatsword, Hey GO FOR IT (Just means you have to spend a move action to pick up your weapon after casting a spell).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Storyteller01, post: 1780984, member: 20931"] My problem is (such as it is :)) is that WotC wants me to pay $120 dollars or more (roughly $40 a book) for minor rules changes that had relegated as GM fiat for the last 25 years. If common sense can't answer this kind of problem, then come up with a nonsensical one. Don't sting your customs over little details. They could just as easily written "The complete book of little guys and gals" with this info printed in it. The previous system was good. It didn't cover every detail, so the GM and the players had room to do what they wanted. If you GM allowed a wizard to wield a Greatsword, Hey GO FOR IT (Just means you have to spend a move action to pick up your weapon after casting a spell). [/QUOTE]

Verification